Bart Van Assche writes:
> A recommended read:
> https://blog.hansenpartnership.com/why-microsoft-is-a-good-steward-for-github/
Thanks for the link. I'll make my son read it too :-)
The problem with open source is "will they be a good steward
*forever*". Sourceforge's only mission was housing
On 06/04/18 19:04, Keith Mendoza wrote:
IMO, I think MS has finally given up fighting the open source/open standards community
(or, at least I don't think they will as long as Nadella is the CEO). I think the amount
of projects that Microsoft has since open-source (albeit quietly) on GitHub
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, at 9:31 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 06/04/18 17:22, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
> > So, I assume most people have seen that Microsoft is purchasing github.
> > We were just about to move Net-SNMP to GitHub, and certainly still can.
> > But it's definitely tim
On 06/04/18 17:22, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
So, I assume most people have seen that Microsoft is purchasing github.
We were just about to move Net-SNMP to GitHub, and certainly still can.
But it's definitely time to check whether we still want to go this
direction. I see the follo
So, I assume most people have seen that Microsoft is purchasing github.
We were just about to move Net-SNMP to GitHub, and certainly still can.
But it's definitely time to check whether we still want to go this
direction. I see the following options:
1) Continue our path and timeline as is
2) P
