On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Jan Safranek wrote:
> On 08/30/2011 12:40 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Regarding your patch: are you aware that it changes the return value of
>> netsnmp_remove_delegated_requests_for_session() such that it always
>> returns zero ?
>
> It's called only on one pla
On 08/30/2011 12:40 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Jan Safranek wrote:
>> Problem is that you *must* dequeue all requests which are related to the
>> closing AgentX session - somewhere deep in these requests there is
>> pointer to the AgentX session and the session
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Jan Safranek wrote:
> Problem is that you *must* dequeue all requests which are related to the
> closing AgentX session - somewhere deep in these requests there is
> pointer to the AgentX session and the session is being freed when closing.
That became clear to m
On 08/29/2011 06:00 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Jan Safranek wrote:
>> I debugged bug 1633670 as far as I could and I have even a
>> proof-of-concept patch, but I am not so happy with it. Could someone
>> with better AgentX knowledge look at it? These parts look a
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Jan Safranek wrote:
> I debugged bug 1633670 as far as I could and I have even a
> proof-of-concept patch, but I am not so happy with it. Could someone
> with better AgentX knowledge look at it? These parts look a bit fragile
> and I don't want to break them apart
Hi guys,
I debugged bug 1633670 as far as I could and I have even a
proof-of-concept patch, but I am not so happy with it. Could someone
with better AgentX knowledge look at it? These parts look a bit fragile
and I don't want to break them apart with wrong patch.
Thanks in advance
Jan
-
