On tor, 2006-11-02 at 22:32 +0100, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>
> I will be forthcoming with a patch that removes the _clear_ functions as they
> aren't yet part of any released version.
Ok, attached is a patch to remove the _clear_default_ functions as they
are of quite limited value.
It is - I t
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:47:31PM -0500, Alex Burger wrote:
> Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> >If I understand it correctly functions in the lib that are to b
> >available on win32 must be listed in win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def.in.
> >
> >If this is correct (could someone who knows windows please corre
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> If I understand it correctly functions in the lib that are to b
> available on win32 must be listed in win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def.in.
>
> If this is correct (could someone who knows windows please correct me if
> it isn't) then i propose that the attached patch should
Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> "MF" == Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> MF> If I understand it correctly functions in the lib that are to b
> MF> available on win32 must be listed in
> MF> win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def.in.
>
> Looks good to me. Assuming others think so, I'll put it i
> "MF" == Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MF> If I understand it correctly functions in the lib that are to b
MF> available on win32 must be listed in
MF> win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def.in.
Looks good to me. Assuming others think so, I'll put it in 5.4.rc2
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta
If I understand it correctly functions in the lib that are to b
available on win32 must be listed in win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def.in.
If this is correct (could someone who knows windows please correct me if
it isn't) then i propose that the attached patch should be added to
5.4.rc2
/MF
Index: w
