RE: There's a tiny bug in sensors

2006-10-31 Thread Bruce Shaw
-Original Message- From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:17 AM To: Bruce Shaw Cc: Net-Snmp-Coders (E-mail) Subject: Re: There's a tiny bug in sensors >>>>> "BS" == Bruce Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BS&

Re: There's a tiny bug in sensors

2006-10-31 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "BS" == Bruce Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BS> I just found out on -users that fan sensors aren't being reported on BS> 240-class Sun servers. Applied to head, FYI. Please apply to other branches (5.3 and 5.2). -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc.

Re: There's a tiny bug in sensors

2006-10-31 Thread Robert Story
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:23:32 -0700 Bruce wrote: BS> I just found out on -users that fan sensors aren't being reported on BS> 240-class Sun servers. BS> BS> Picld is reporting the fans differently than what I'm used to. The BS> infrastructure is already in place for fixing this - it's just a diffe

RE: There's a tiny bug in sensors

2006-10-30 Thread Bruce Shaw
The only machines affected are those reporting their statistics from picld. Of those, the only ones having the bug are the 240-class machines including netra-240. I don't have one to test, but I've sent the code to the poster on -users having the original problem. I did run the code on a V880. I

Re: There's a tiny bug in sensors

2006-10-30 Thread Thomas Anders
Bruce Shaw wrote: > I just found out on -users that fan sensors aren't being reported on > 240-class Sun servers. > > Picld is reporting the fans differently than what I'm used to. The > infrastructure is already in place for fixing this - it's just a different > call to an existing module known