RE: performance issue on simultaneously walk

2005-09-22 Thread Fong Tsui
- From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 9:58 AM To: Fong Tsui Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: performance issue on simultaneously walk >>>>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:44:14 +0200, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: performance issue on simultaneously walk

2005-06-07 Thread Fong Tsui
Subject: Re: performance issue on simultaneously walk On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:35:59PM -0700, Fong Tsui wrote: > > I have a subagent behind a master agent. When I do a single walk a MIB > tree, it is very fast. However, when I do simultaneously walk on the > same MIB tree, bo

Re: performance issue on simultaneously walk

2005-06-02 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:57:53 -0700 Wes wrote: WH> However, remember that the agent only processes one request at a time [...] Not true. For a get request, it may be delegate, which is how AgentX works. So the various phases of two AgentX requests could be intermixed. Another big factor here could

Re: performance issue on simultaneously walk

2005-06-02 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:44:14 +0200, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: >> I suspect two things: >> 1) That master agent talking to subagent with simultaneous queries slows >> down the speed? Magnus> That shouldn't be the the case - there is additional overhead Magnus> as you a

Re: performance issue on simultaneously walk

2005-06-01 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 05:35:59PM -0700, Fong Tsui wrote: > > I have a subagent behind a master agent. When I do a single walk a MIB > tree, it is very fast. However, when I do simultaneously walk on the > same MIB tree, both walk take unbelievable long time. One report says > 5min vs 45 sec (two