On 01/06/07, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not thrilled about the idea of lots of similarly named files
> (eg 'interface.c')...
That's fair enough.
I'm not particularly thrilled about it either.
> I'd rather eliminate the sub-directory, though I'm not
> keen on that idea either
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:03:35 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> The other contributory factor is that there's a lot of duplication in
DS> this naming
DS> system - particularly with the multi-level directory structure. If
DS> you've got a
DS> table SomeTable, then the files will typically be called
DS>
D
On 01/06/07, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If star is used, I believe it's only the windows folks that are affected.
Probably.
But Windows is meant to be a supported platform.
(Now who's foolish idea was that...)
> I don't suppose anyone would like my idea that 'mibgroup' be moved
Being new to the whole NetSNMP structure and everything, I kind of like seeing
the "-mib" included in the directory name for the MIB.It reminds me the
directory is for MIB specific stuff rather than some generic directory.
My 2-cents of course
Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:41:33 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> >> I can always move them into the correct locations
WH> >> (since the individual flenames are correct), but it
WH> >> does look as if we should seriously consider shortening
WH> >> these names.
WH>
WH> TA> I'd be fine with that. "svn move" was one
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I can always move them into the correct locations
>> (since the individual flenames are correct), but it
>> does look as if we should seriously consider shortening
>> these names.
TA> I'd be fine with that. "svn move" was one of the reaso
Dave Shield wrote:
> I can always move them into the correct locations
> (since the individual flenames are correct), but it
> does look as if we should seriously consider shortening
> these names.
I'd be fine with that. "svn move" was one of the reasons we went SVN
after all.
+Thomas
--
Thoma
On 22/05/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dist/makerelease uses "star artype=ustar" for better portability. Does
> it solve your Windows problems?
No.
Things are better, in that the offending files no longer
overwrite each other. So I do at least end up with all
of the necessary f
Dave Shield wrote:
> 5.4.1.pre1, repackaged to remove the .svn folders
>
>> Can you please double-check whether it has likely been produced by
>> "star" oder GNU tar on the corresponding release manager machine?
>
> "tar" (which is probably GNU tar).
dist/makerelease uses "star artype=ustar" for
On 22/05/07, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote:
> >Now we've moved to SVN, can we perhaps address the issue of
> > over-long filenames. Unpacking the tarball (sans .svn directories) under
> > Windows gave me twenty warnings about one file overwriting another.
>
> Are
Dave Shield wrote:
>Now we've moved to SVN, can we perhaps address the issue of
> over-long filenames. Unpacking the tarball (sans .svn directories) under
> Windows gave me twenty warnings about one file overwriting another.
Are you talking about the 5.2.4 tarball or the 5.4.1.pre1 one?
Can y
On 22/05/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DS> The tarball seems to include assorted '.svn' directories.
> DS> These probably ought to be stripped out as part of the release
> DS> process.
>
> This was caused by your usage of "svn checkout" instead of "svn
> export" in makerelease... I
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> problem #1:
DS> http://www.net-snmp.org/download.html
DS> "Pre-releases or release-candidates for upcoming publications
DS> [No pre-releases available at this time]"
You hit it in the 5 minute window between the announcement and the
page u
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> The tarball seems to include assorted '.svn' directories.
DS> These probably ought to be stripped out as part of the release
DS> process.
DS> [I suspect that the same problem affects 5.2.4 as well]
This was caused by your usage of "svn ch
On 22/05/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The first of the release series for the 5.4.1 release is available.
> Please test as appropriate and report any problems!
>
> http://www.net-snmp.org/download/
Problem #2:
The tarball seems to include assorted '.svn' directories.
These
On 22/05/07, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22/05/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The first of the release series for the 5.4.1 release is available.
> > Please test as appropriate and report any problems!
> >
> > http://www.net-snmp.org/download/
>
> problem #1:
On 22/05/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The first of the release series for the 5.4.1 release is available.
> Please test as appropriate and report any problems!
>
> http://www.net-snmp.org/download/
problem #1:
http://www.net-snmp.org/download.html
"Pre-releases or rel
17 matches
Mail list logo
