Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On fre, 2007-12-21 at 16:31 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
>> What ever the problem with sockets is, it's a different one, that
>> transport was built in. But not to worry.
>
> Yes, but it is interesting as it should work.
> If you add the flag -Dtdomain,netsnmp_unix_transpor
On fre, 2007-12-21 at 16:31 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
>
> In fact I had tried using TCP and it used to fail with the "no support
> for any checked transport domain" cruft. I just got the guy who
> compiled net-snmp for me to email across the configure line he used and
> for reasons best know to h
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On fre, 2007-12-21 at 11:56 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I cannot correctly attached agentx subagents to my snmpd. If attempting
>> to use unix sockets, the attach just fails with "No Checked Transport
>> Domain" but that's fine, they attach just OK over udp.
On fre, 2007-12-21 at 11:56 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I cannot correctly attached agentx subagents to my snmpd. If attempting
> to use unix sockets, the attach just fails with "No Checked Transport
> Domain" but that's fine, they attach just OK over udp.
Eh, I suppose you are runnin
