Working now, the problem was you need to pass the void pointer to
snmp_sess_synch_response(), not the session pointer.
T
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:35 PM, th exterit wrote:
> I followed README.threads but it still kept tripping up on the
> corresponding snmp_sess_synch_response() function.
>
> I
I followed README.threads but it still kept tripping up on the corresponding
snmp_sess_synch_response() function.
I would be grateful if anyone would take a look at my code (edited for
brevity) and spot anything I'm doing wrong - http://pastebin.com/FxQ2AuCQ
Theres something about that "status =
Many thanks Dave, will give it a go.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 16:47, th exterit wrote:
> > Now, I've only just read that Net-SNMP isn't strictly thread safe.
> > Is there any way around this at all?
>
> Use the "Single Session" style of routines (s
On 1 April 2011 16:47, th exterit wrote:
> Now, I've only just read that Net-SNMP isn't strictly thread safe.
> Is there any way around this at all?
Use the "Single Session" style of routines (snmp_sess_*)
See README.threads for details
Dave
