RE: Security Posture in net-snmp

2009-04-13 Thread Mike Ayers
ecure > 3.very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration) > > > May i know the security posture in net-snmp ? Security posture is a deplyment issue, not an implementation issue. It is your ch

Re: Security Posture in net-snmp

2009-04-13 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:38:16 +0530, Pachiappan D > said: PD> RFC 3414 allows the following security postures , PD> 1. minimum-secure PD> 2.semi-secure PD> 3.very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration) Be default we have no configuration of either snmpv3 users or snmpv1/v2c community n

Re: Security Posture in net-snmp

2009-04-13 Thread Pachiappan D
tion) > > May i know the security posture in net-snmp ? > > Thanks in advance. > -Pachi- > -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial o

Security Posture in net-snmp

2009-04-08 Thread Pachiappan D
Hi, I am extending the net-snmp agent (5.4.1). RFC 3414 allows the following security postures , 1. minimum-secure 2.semi-secure 3.very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration) May i know the security posture in net-snmp ? Thanks in advance. -Pachi