Shield [d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 1:11 PM
To: Mayank Mittal (WT01 - GMT-Telecom Equipment)
Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: TRAPS sent for excluded MIBS
On 23 August 2010 08:19, wrote:
> Do we have any patches now to support this notify v
On 23 August 2010 08:19, wrote:
> Do we have any patches now to support this notify view over traps ?
No.
Nobody has submitted anything to address this issue
since the discussion earlier this year.
> Please suggest as this has become a high priority defect in our code.
> Need your valuable gui
Hi Dave,
I am using net-snmp-5.4.1.2.
Do we have any patches now to support this notify view over traps ?
Please suggest as this has become a high priority defect in our code.
Need your valuable guidance.
Thanks,
Mayank
On 17 February 2010 12:09, Mayank Mittal
mailto:maymi...@cisco.com>> wro
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:44:32 +0530 Mayank wrote:
MM> Thanks for the speedy response. It was a great help.
MM> This means that it is not possible to restrict particular TRAPS from being
MM> send by the agent or received by the server, using snmp views.
MM> Plz correct if my understanding is wrong an
@lists.sourceforge.net;
mayank.mitt...@wipro.com
Subject: Re: TRAPS sent for excluded MIBS
Thanks for that detail - it makes things much clearer.
One comment about the access control settings:
group network-operator usm user1
rouser user1
I strongly suggest that you use *either* the com2sec/group/access
;
mayank.mitt...@wipro.com
Subject: Re: TRAPS sent for excluded MIBS
Thanks for that detail - it makes things much clearer.
One comment about the access control settings:
group network-operator usm user1
rouser user1
I strongly suggest that you use *either* the com2sec/group/access approach,
*or* the
-coders@lists.sourceforge.net; mayank.mitt...@wipro.com
Subject: Re: TRAPS sent for excluded MIBS
On 17 February 2010 10:53, wrote:
> I have excluded a particular MIB using VIEWS, hence when I do an snmpwalk
> those MIBS are not shown.
How exactly have you configured the access control f
;
mayank.mitt...@wipro.com
Subject: Re: TRAPS sent for excluded MIBS
Thanks for that detail - it makes things much clearer.
One comment about the access control settings:
group network-operator usm user1
rouser user1
I strongly suggest that you use *either* the com2sec/group/access approach,
*or* the
Thanks for that detail - it makes things much clearer.
One comment about the access control settings:
group network-operator usm user1
rouser user1
I strongly suggest that you use *either* the com2sec/group/access approach,
*or* the r[ow]{user,community} approach.But do not try to mix
Hello Everybody...
This is my first post to this mailing list...I am new to SNMP...will you plz
guide me howto use this packages( I have net-snmp 5.4.2.1) installed on
Solaris. I had gone through all the theories of it...I need some guidelines
on the following point :-
- How to start with age
On 17 February 2010 10:53, wrote:
> I have excluded a particular MIB using VIEWS, hence when I do an snmpwalk
> those MIBS are not shown.
How exactly have you configured the access control for the agent?
> But, when some parameters of that MIB is changed, TRAPS are sent indicating
> the change
Hi,
I am using net-snmp-5.4.1.2.
I have excluded a particular MIB using VIEWS, hence when I do an snmpwalk those
MIBS are not shown.
But, when some parameters of that MIB is changed, TRAPS are sent indicating the
changed values of that MIB.
My understanding is that as those MIBS are ex
12 matches
Mail list logo
