Re: about the problem of index

2007-05-03 Thread Dave Shield
[Sorry for the delay in responding] On 23/03/07, Clement Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... i want to correct the > result as following: > > IEEE802dot11-MIB::dot11GroupAddressesStatus.1.1 = INTEGER: active(1) > IEEE802dot11-MIB:: dot11GroupAddressesStatus.2.2 = INTEGER: active(1) > > IEEE8

Re: about the problem of index

2007-03-23 Thread Clement Hsu
Dear Dave: Thank you. And if this looks reasonable, then , is i want to correct the result as following: IEEE802dot11-MIB::dot11GroupAddressesStatus.1.1 = INTEGER: active(1) IEEE802dot11-MIB::dot11GroupAddressesStatus.2.2 = INTEGER: active(1) IEEE802dot11-MIB::dot11GroupAddressesStatus.3 .3 =

Re: about the problem of index

2007-03-23 Thread Dave Shield
On 23/03/07, Clement Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > dot11GroupAddressesEntry OBJECT-TYPE > INDEX { ifIndex, > dot11GroupAddressesIndex} > ::= { dot11GroupAddressesTable 1 } > When I perform snmpwork, I got the following result: > > IEEE802dot11-MIB::dot11GroupAddres

about the problem of index

2007-03-23 Thread Clement Hsu
Dear All: I am Clement. I meet a problem about write 802dot11MIB table. the MIB is as following: ___ [802dot11MIB-dot11GroupAddressesTable]: dot11GroupAddressesTable OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF D