On 4 August 2010 17:33, Brendan Tauras wrote:
> is SNMP_MSG_GET or SNMP_MSG_GETBULK
> (with non-repeaters set) preferred when requesting a couple OIDs
> scattered throughout the MIB tree?
It depends on whether you are retrieving object with known indexes,
or require fuzzy matching (and whether y
Related to the previous question, is SNMP_MSG_GET or SNMP_MSG_GETBULK
(with non-repeaters set) preferred when requesting a couple OIDs
scattered throughout the MIB tree?
What is the difference between
1. SNMP_MSG_GET
# snmpget -d sysDescr sysContact
and
2. SNMP_MSG_GETBULK
# snmpbulkget -C n2 -
On 30 July 2010 15:21, shardul kumar wrote:
>But the same thing [returning multiple values] can be achieved by filling
> oids in var_bind list of GETNEXT PDU. I can provide all the
> oids of a table in var_bind and get the entire data in one shot.
Listing all the column OIDs within a GETNEX
On 2010-07-30 16:00, shardul kumar:
> Hi All,
>
> Could any one please let me know why do we need snmpbulk while
> snmpwalk(using GETNEXT)
> is already available for bulk data transfer. I mean to say if I am able to
> retrieve all the rows of a
> table using GETNEXT then what is so special in GETBU
On 7/30/10, shardul kumar wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Thanks for your reply. But the same thing can be achieved by filling
> oids in var_bind list of GETNEXT PDU. I can provide all the
> oids of a table in var_bind and get the entire data in one shot.
> Please explain.
If you can get everything in o
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 07:30:54PM +0530, shardul kumar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Could any one please let me know why do we need snmpbulk while
> snmpwalk(using GETNEXT)
> is already available for bulk data transfer. I mean to say if I am able to
> retrieve all the rows of a
> table using GETNEXT then
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your reply. But the same thing can be achieved by filling
oids in var_bind list of GETNEXT PDU. I can provide all the
oids of a table in var_bind and get the entire data in one shot.
Please explain.
Thanks,
Ravi
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Steve Friedl wrote:
> On
Hi All,
Could any one please let me know why do we need snmpbulk while
snmpwalk(using GETNEXT)
is already available for bulk data transfer. I mean to say if I am able to
retrieve all the rows of a
table using GETNEXT then what is so special in GETBULK ?
Thanks,
Ravi
--
