On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> 2009/4/21 Bart Van Assche :
>> wrote:
>>> OK - I've reverted that patch, and applied a simpler one to deal
>>> with the immediate problem. (i.e. skip any fd's that are too large
>>> to be handled by fd_set, etc).
>>
>> Can you please remove t
2009/4/21 Bart Van Assche :
> wrote:
>> OK - I've reverted that patch, and applied a simpler one to deal
>> with the immediate problem. (i.e. skip any fd's that are too large
>> to be handled by fd_set, etc).
>
> Can you please remove the ">= FD_SETSIZE" tests again ? These cause
> the Windows sn
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Dave Shield
wrote:
> OK - I've reverted that patch, and applied a simpler one to deal
> with the immediate problem. (i.e. skip any fd's that are too large
> to be handled by fd_set, etc).
Hello Dave,
Can you please remove the ">= FD_SETSIZE" tests again ? These
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
> 2009/4/20 Bart Van Assche :
>> I was considering to prepare a patch that does the following:
>
> [snip]
>
>> If I understood the above correctly such a patch should wait until version
>> 5.6 ?
>
> If you can come up with a suitable patch fai
2009/4/20 Bart Van Assche :
> I was considering to prepare a patch that does the following:
[snip]
> If I understood the above correctly such a patch should wait until version
> 5.6 ?
If you can come up with a suitable patch fairly quickly,
post it to the patches tracker and we can discuss h
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Dave Shield
wrote:
> 2009/4/18 Bart Van Assche :
>> Apparently the patch with ID 1627049
>> (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1627049&group_id=12694&atid=312694)
>> has been applied on the 5.5pre branch. Please revert this patch --
>> this
2009/4/18 Bart Van Assche :
> Apparently the patch with ID 1627049
> (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1627049&group_id=12694&atid=312694)
> has been applied on the 5.5pre branch. Please revert this patch --
> this patch not only causes portability problems but IMHO it's the
Hello,
Apparently the patch with ID 1627049
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1627049&group_id=12694&atid=312694)
has been applied on the 5.5pre branch. Please revert this patch --
this patch not only causes portability problems but IMHO it's the
wrong way to fix the observ
