Wes> I believe the fix that I thought Dave? wrote actually cached the names
Wes> and used previously cached numbers based on interface names.
Yup.
Robert> I think the SIOCGIFINDEX method is probably cleaner
Probably, though of course it won't necessarily be available across all
architectures.
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:44:48 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> Jeff> I've just opened bug 1038616 against this problem, which
WH> Jeff> also seems related to bugs 860414 and 865415. The bug description
WH> Jeff> follows. A patch has been attached to the bug.
WH>
WH> Out of curiosity, have you tried the 5.2.p
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:55:59 -0700 Jeff wrote:
JJ> We have encountered a problem with the way the interfaces mib code
JJ> (agent/mibgroup/mibII/interfaces.c) calculates and handles ifIndex
JJ> values in our Linux-based system. The root cause is that this code uses
JJ> the ordinal order of appearanc
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:55:59 -0700, "Jeff Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Jeff> As I have previously mentioned, I'm trying to convert our
Jeff> 5.0.7-based code to 5.1.2. One of the things I've encountered
Jeff> is a fix to a bug that was applied locally, but apparently was
Jeff> never co
As I have previously mentioned, I’m trying to convert
our 5.0.7-based code to 5.1.2. One of the things I’ve encountered
is a fix to a bug that was applied locally, but apparently was never
communicated to the net-snmp group, or was never applied, since the bug is
present in the 5.1.2 code.
