RE: re-reading snmpd.conf file question - ifTable

2010-11-11 Thread Judith Walker
exercise, so thanks for the kernel insights. Judy -Original Message- From: Robert Story [mailto:rst...@freesnmp.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 8:22 PM To: Judith Walker Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: re-reading snmpd.conf file question - ifTable On Tue, 9

Re: re-reading snmpd.conf file question - ifTable

2010-11-10 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:45:33 -0800 Judith wrote: JW> I believe that I found one answer to my delima wrt the ifTable not being refreshed when an interface goes away. The code actually notices that the interface went away, but it's not clear when we should simply mark an interface as down versus act

RE: re-reading snmpd.conf file question - ifTable

2010-11-09 Thread Judith Walker
Judy Walker From: Judith Walker [mailto:judith.wal...@jdsu.com] Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 4:22 PM To: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: re-reading snmpd.conf file question I'm finding that when reading the ifTable, some old deleted interfaces are still around. So my snmp

re-reading snmpd.conf file question

2010-11-05 Thread Judith Walker
I'm finding that when reading the ifTable, some old deleted interfaces are still around. So my snmpwalk of the IfTable is showing data that is out-of-date. (By the way, ethtool does not seem to have this problem.) If I look at the /var/lib/net-snmp/snmpd.conf file, it is correct. In other wo