On 2006-11-23 02:22:58 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
> The attached patch fixes dist/net-snmp.spec to allow for building RPMs on
> 64-bit
> platforms by consistently using proper %{_libdir} (translating to /usr/lib64
> on
> x86_64) instead of hard-coding /usr/lib. Tested on RHEL4/x86 and RHEL4/x86_
Dave Shield wrote:
> I'm slightly surprised the "find" uses a wildcard rather than the _libdir
> macro,
> but if it works, then fair enough.
find uses usr/lib... (*without* a leading slash), so _libdir wouldn't work.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-
On 23/11/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached patch fixes dist/net-snmp.spec to allow for building RPMs on
> 64-bit
> platforms by consistently using proper %{_libdir} (translating to /usr/lib64
> on
> x86_64) instead of hard-coding /usr/lib. Tested on RHEL4/x86 and RHEL4/x
Robert Story wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:22:58 +0100 Thomas wrote:
> TA> The attached patch fixes dist/net-snmp.spec to allow for building RPMs on
> 64-bit
> TA> platforms by consistently using proper %{_libdir} (translating to
> /usr/lib64 on
> TA> x86_64) instead of hard-coding /usr/lib. Te
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:22:58 +0100 Thomas wrote:
TA> The attached patch fixes dist/net-snmp.spec to allow for building RPMs on
64-bit
TA> platforms by consistently using proper %{_libdir} (translating to
/usr/lib64 on
TA> x86_64) instead of hard-coding /usr/lib. Tested on RHEL4/x86 and
RHEL4/x86
The attached patch fixes dist/net-snmp.spec to allow for building RPMs on 64-bit
platforms by consistently using proper %{_libdir} (translating to /usr/lib64 on
x86_64) instead of hard-coding /usr/lib. Tested on RHEL4/x86 and RHEL4/x86_64.
I'm calling for quick votes to include this in 5.4.
+Tho
