> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> here we go. the final one. i hope :)
TA> +1 (on v3 of this patch)
Applied. All current branches. Thanks!
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
This SF.net email is spons
Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> here we go. the final one. i hope :)
+1 (on v3 of this patch)
+Thomas
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of you
On 2007-07-04 15:50:46 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 20:15:27 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> On 04/07/07, Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DS> > ok after another discussion on irc with robert and thomas, we got v2 of
> DS> > the patch. instead of removing the asserts we make
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 20:15:27 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> On 04/07/07, Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DS> > ok after another discussion on irc with robert and thomas, we got v2 of
DS> > the patch. instead of removing the asserts we make the conditions static
DS> > strings. the compiler shuts up
On 04/07/07, Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok after another discussion on irc with robert and thomas, we got v2 of
> the patch. instead of removing the asserts we make the conditions static
> strings. the compiler shuts up and robert still gets his debug message.
Why is the first as
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:32:42 +0200 Marcus wrote:
MR> ok after another discussion on irc with robert and thomas, we got v2 of
MR> the patch. instead of removing the asserts we make the conditions static
MR> strings. the compiler shuts up and robert still gets his debug message.
+1
-
Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> ok after another discussion on irc with robert and thomas, we got v2 of
> the patch. instead of removing the asserts we make the conditions static
> strings. the compiler shuts up and robert still gets his debug message.
+1 with remark: Could you add the "always false/fail
On 2007-07-04 17:42:57 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> all the asserts removed in this patch use != or == for string
> comparison, which is undefined in C. after a discussion on irc with Wes
> and Robert, i followed Wes' suggestion and removed the offending
> asserts.
>
> Can we still apply it for
hi,
all the asserts removed in this patch use != or == for string
comparison, which is undefined in C. after a discussion on irc with Wes
and Robert, i followed Wes' suggestion and removed the offending
asserts.
Can we still apply it for 5.4.1?:)
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is
