Re: snmp-community-mib impl how

2008-10-28 Thread Dana Burns
I was thinking about this again (see netsnmp-coders archive, same subject), and would like to "merge" the com2sec solution with the rfc3584 co-existence specfication, and at the same time satisfy the concerns MF had with my previous ideas regarding transport-specific code. I'd like any feedback on

Re: snmp-community-mib impl how

2006-12-02 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On fre, 2006-12-01 at 10:20 -0500, Dana Burns wrote: > Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > >On tor, 2006-11-30 at 16:35 -0500, Dana Burns wrote: > > > >>- define formats for new snmpd.conf directives for each of the > >>implemented transports corrosponding to > >>the nonVolatile com2sec rows, e.g.

Re: snmp-community-mib impl how

2006-12-01 Thread Thomas Anders
Dana Burns wrote: > Magnus Fromreide wrote: >> What can apps/snmpcomm do that snmpset can't do if we assume that your >> mib module is available? >> > Probably nothing other than conveniently packing the needed snmpsets > together? I could certainly see the benefit of that. +Thomas -- Thomas

Re: snmp-community-mib impl how

2006-12-01 Thread Dana Burns
Magnus Fromreide wrote: >On tor, 2006-11-30 at 16:35 -0500, Dana Burns wrote: > > >>If one was to implement the snmp-community-mib, would the following be a >>reasonable approach? >> >> > >I do not like it. >On the other hand it should be noted that I think net-snmp is altogether >to tangl

Re: snmp-community-mib impl how

2006-11-30 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On tor, 2006-11-30 at 16:35 -0500, Dana Burns wrote: > If one was to implement the snmp-community-mib, would the following be a > reasonable approach? I do not like it. On the other hand it should be noted that I think net-snmp is altogether to tangled up in abstraction levels already. > - defi

Re: snmp-community-mib impl how

2006-11-30 Thread Dave Shield
On 30/11/06, Dana Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If one was to implement the snmp-community-mib, would the following be a > reasonable approach? I'll have a proper look at this tomorrow, but one thing immediately springs to mind: > - define formats for new snmpd.conf directives for each of

Re: snmp-community-mib impl how

2006-11-30 Thread Dana Burns
If one was to implement the snmp-community-mib, would the following be a reasonable approach? - define formats for new snmpd.conf directives for each of the implemented transports corrosponding to the nonVolatile com2sec rows, e.g. comm2SecUdp, comm2SecUdp6, comm2SecUnix, or a single "