On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:02:18 - Colin wrote:
CW> In my case I have a real problem as the netsnmp is not run as a separate
CW> process but is part of my sub-agent, so reconfiguring the ports requires
CW> the whole process (which includes other stuff) to be exited and
CW> restarted (due to the memo
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:15:22 +0100 Magnus wrote:
> MF> On tor, 2007-11-15 at 08:23 +, Colin Wernham wrote:
> MF> > I have a problem with re-loading the snmpd.conf config using
> MF> > update_config() function as it appears to not do any reloading
of
> MF> >
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:15:22 +0100 Magnus wrote:
MF> On tor, 2007-11-15 at 08:23 +, Colin Wernham wrote:
MF> > I have a problem with re-loading the snmpd.conf config using
MF> > update_config() function as it appears to not do any reloading of
MF> > config.
MF>
MF>
On tor, 2007-11-15 at 08:23 +, Colin Wernham wrote:
> I have a problem with re-loading the snmpd.conf config using
> update_config() function as it appears to not do any reloading of
> config.
It does reload the config. If you were to try again with the flag
-Dsnmpd_ports you wou
I have a problem with re-loading the snmpd.conf config using
update_config() function as it appears to not do any reloading of
config.
If I change the agentaddress config to a different port and then call
update_config(), the old port remains open and the new one is not opened
(as viewed by
when i run snmpd under valgrind and called
'update_config' for dynamic configuration update, i
get following valgrind logs :-
==32367==by 0x8171278: netsnmp_tdata_create_row
(in /root/wichorus/snmpd)
==32367==by 0x80A0714: mteObjects_createEntry
(mteObjects.c:123)
==323
; statements in my snmpd.conf file. If i remove
> 'proxy'
> > statements, this errors disappear.
> >
> > morover I see memory leak while snmpd updates with
> new
> > conf file. the memory grows everytime snmpd is
> updated
> > with 'update_config'
rover I see memory leak while snmpd updates with new
> conf file. the memory grows everytime snmpd is updated
> with 'update_config'.
Is the memory leak limited to the use of the proxy directive? If not,
can you track it down to any other directive(s) in your snmpd.conf?
How much
Hi,
I want my snmpd to take the update dynamically from
the snmpd.conf file.
After updating the snmpd.conf i am calling
'update_config' function to get the agent updated with
new changes in configuration.
It throws following error when updating:
error on subcontainer ''
