> On Fri, 19 May 2006 11:51:47 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Robert> One of the other project I'm working on just recently
Robert> converted to svn. While it seems to be mostly the same, I hit
Robert> two major annoyances:
So which side of the voting fence would you end up on,
On Wed, 10 May 2006 22:29:11 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> darix wrote:
TA> > as the SF.net CVS is still/again unstable, i would like to suggest
TA> > moving to svn.
TA>
TA> Seconded. Wes has always argued that the users should decide which I
TA> tend to agree to. Now that SF.net is offering SVN servic
darix wrote:
as the SF.net CVS is still/again unstable, i would like to suggest
moving to svn.
Seconded. Wes has always argued that the users should decide which I
tend to agree to. Now that SF.net is offering SVN services officially,
the poll is overdue.
Advantages I see for the move:
N
hi,
as the SF.net CVS is still/again unstable, i would like to suggest
moving to svn. I brought up this topic on irc a few times already.
Mediawiki used one of the last downtime for the migration aswell. [1]
Advantages I see for the move:
- similar UI as CVS
- changesets
- directory versioning
-
