Hi Greeting:
I am wondering if any one has seen the similar situation like I did as the
following.
I have two C routine (var_) to handle two tables. To run the "snmpwalk -c
publick localhost Table1" returned the correct values of that table.
However to run the same command to
William :
Thanks a lot for your advice.
valley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 11:24 AM
To: valley
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No response to mib browser
Valley:
Do not post to the ne
It seems that I am quite close to getting the ./configure
parameters list correct. I can now get make to compile
all the files, and the link stage starts. My current
problem concerns undefined references, and the extract
from the make follows:
=
Extract from make - start
Valley:
Do not post to the net-snmp-users list with html. Use only
text.
I suspect your answer is to be found in the FAQ. Failing that,
use the net-snmp-users list archive, found on the website
under the menu item lists. If you use the
query function in the upper left hand corner of the lists
Hi Greeting:
Is it the nature of getnext to return whatever the "immediate" next object? I
have two tables in my MIB. I explicitly "block" the values of the
objects in the first table for testing purpose. The getnext to the object in the
first table returned me the value of the firs
hi,all
I planed to extend the agent
(net-agent5.1.2) in win32.The following is what i did:
1 Wrote a tested mib file
2 Used mib2c to general the code
template and modified these code
3 Modified the snmpdsdk project
(vc6) 3.1 Deleted the definition of
WIN32SERVICE
3.2
Modified the
Thomas Anders wrote:
Markku Laukkanen wrote:
There is two different approaches to this one
a) Enlarge the UDP packet buffer in kernel
b) Write snmptrapd in a multithreaded fashion
I have done b) approach and it is quite straightforward.
Do you care to submit your patches back to the project?
Impo
Thanks for that information, we will in the short term have a look at
increasing the UDP buffers and test how successful this is. The
multithreaded approach sounds interesting though, but I'm not sure we
have the necessary C skills to carry out the necessary changes and
rather than re-inventing the
Chuck Yerkes wrote:
If you can't use sender then where do we stop. Perhaps the Subject
could contain the date the message was sent as well.
No, we have a billion email headers.
Remain calm. We're talking about adding a mailinglist id to the
subject line which is something that's quite *common* in
> > That will be down to the way that this particular table has been
> > implemented. Have you got access to the code that does this?
> Could you be more explicit? where could I found this code?
No idea.
This table is not part of the core distribution, so it must have
been added by somebody el
Hi,
a)I have created a snmp v2 group using the command::
"snmpvacm -v2c -c public 10.254.24.227 createSec2Group 3 myGroup RWGroup"
which creates the group "myGroup".
Is it the right method?? Does this only fulfills my requirement of creating
a snmpv2 group??
Please suggest if I am wrong!!
b)
> This global variable is defined in \snmplib\container.c (net-snmp 5.1.2)
> line 10: static netsnmp_container *containers = NULL;
OK - Thanks.
Robert is the expert on this feature, so no doubt he
will correct me when I go wrong.
> I am confused what this container list stores.
As I underst
> > As you can see, "prLnActTT" and "prLnAlTT" are READ ONLY.
> >
> > The problem is that when I execute the next command:
> >
> > snmpset -v3 -ume -aMD5 -A"mypassword" -lauthNoPriv localhost
> > prLnActTT.4.3 t
> >
> > the agente allow me to change the value of this READ ONLY var
Hi ,
I still did not get any solution to my problem
of snmp Server engineID.
Can u help me by explaining as to how I can
set engineID in snmp V3?
I want to set and delete engineID from
configurations.
WIth Regards;Sanjay
Madan
>I am using Red Hat Linux Advanced Server 3.0 (kernel 2.4.21-4.ELsmp).
> This Advanced Server distribution comes with net-snmp-5.0.8 installed by
> default. There are other application running on my machine which uses
> this net-snmp. So, it is not possible for me to uninstall the package.
N
Thanks for your response!
This global variable is defined in \snmplib\container.c (net-snmp 5.1.2)
line 10: static netsnmp_container *containers = NULL;
I am confused what this container list stores.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Shi
Markku Laukkanen wrote:
There is two different approaches to this one
a) Enlarge the UDP packet buffer in kernel
b) Write snmptrapd in a multithreaded fashion
I have done b) approach and it is quite straightforward.
Do you care to submit your patches back to the project?
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (t
> Now, I want to integrate the error messages sent out by the snmp agent into
> the native logging system of the device.
>
> Where are the errors logged from the net-snmp agent (not the debuglog)?
Have a look at 'snmplib/snmp_logging.c'
In particular, the last couple of hundred lines of code.
> I can not understand the use of global variable "containers".
Which global variable are you referring to?
I've had a quick look through the current source tree,
and can't immediately spot this.
Which file are you looking at?
Dave
---
SF.Ne
> What exactly is an API (Application Programming Interface)
A fancy name for a function call.
Or rather, a collection of function calls, return values, data structures,
etc - together with a fixed definition of their expected behaviour.
Basically an API describes what somebody writing a progra
Mark Dollemore wrote:
I am trying to use snmptrapd to process large numbers of traps as
generated from our Trading Systems. Testing has shown that when large
number of traps are received (750+/sec) that traps are then dropped in
large quantities. Why is this happenning?, Can it be prevented?. I
Notice:
This posting has been resent, owing to the apparent
failure of its earlier posting to be serviced by the
SourceForge email system. Thanks for your patience.
William R. Buckley
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 200
22 matches
Mail list logo
