On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 01:41, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> 5.2.2.rc2 is now available on the SourceForge download servers.
> Please give it a whirl. See the ChangeLog enclosed for the few bugs
> we've fixed in the last week.
Should the binary_rpm target of the dist/Makefile work on
a linux box with an x8
Also you are saying the net-snmp stack doesn't reverse the order, so I
(the mib implementator) need to do it?
Thank you,
Yong Chen
-Original Message-
From: Yong Chen (yongche)
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 1:36 PM
To: 'Dave Shield'
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: R
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the reply. Then how should I get the response OCTET STRING?
How did you get 0x90 & 0x20 ?
Thanks,
Yong Chen
-Original Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 1:15 AM
To: Yong Chen (yongche)
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourc
Hi,
I am quite new to Linux and all I wanted to do was enable generation of snmp traps from my fedora core 3 box to my NMS. I have installed the net-snmp package and still expolring it. 2 questions here :
1) Have added trap2sink in the snmpd.conf file for testing of snmp traps. But apparently i
Hello,
I want to fill a table, for example the interfaces.ifTable from the mib-2
with dummy entries. How can I do this? Do I need a special config file for
this purpose? I'm relatively new to SNMP, so I first want to run some tests
on my own computer.
Thanks in advance,
Klaus Gürtler
--
Telefon
Hello,
Thanks for your response..
Yes you are right..I have to implement same MIB for
multiple process. Or you can consider something like
this..Two instances of same subagent process is
running on diferent processor..
I got your point, in this case Subagent should
register the object instance
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 17:46 -0700, Yong Chen (yongche) wrote:
> I have a question regarding BITS object, please help.
> I'm using netsnmp 5.1.
That's fairly old - we'd strongly suggest that you upgrade.
mib2c has never been very good at handling BITS-syntax objects,
but I believe that newer versio
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 17:12 +, xuemei wrote:
> I run “mib2c 1.3.6.1.4.1.123456789”,
>
> 1.It looks like the mib2c does not like the fake enterprise number ,
> that is why it decides to start from the 1.3.6.1.4.1 each time?
You need to tell mib2c to load the MIB files that define the
MIB subt