Hi,
alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what do you mean by recompiling ssl libraries in a correct manner?
I do not know the way you installed ssl and net-snmp,
but I guess, from your original e-mail, you installed openssl
onto /usr/local/ssl and tried to build net-snmp using it.
OpenSSL:
% tar
Hi,
Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a FreeBSD ports package for 5.4.1? Looking at
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/files/ it
> doesn't look
especially well-maintained. I'd say 5.4.1 may well be the better choice for
most people, but
YMMV.
I
On 14/01/2008, arijit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What I was looking for was a way to specify a host ip address or a subnet
> ip
> address - which, I can specify in the com2sec directive!
You can specify the source host/subnet for SNMPv1/2c requests,
as part of mapping the community to an int
On 11/01/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it not mandatory that only in case of SNMPv3 request the VACM related
> parameters will be verified .
No.
The VACM settings will be used to validate *any* incoming request.
Both community-based requests and SNMPv3 user-based reques
On 10/01/2008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was using table_tdata api
> my table only uses one index (say world index), and has a few columns, one
> of them is client count. when I browser the table from a mib browser, I
> can only
> see the column of clientcount with correct values of th
On 10/01/2008, Nikolett C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to ask, whether there's a possibility to use the commands snmpget,
> snmpwalk etc. in the Windows comman line (cmd.exe).
Yes.
The Net-SNMP suite includes client-side commands (snmpget, etc)
which will work on Windows as well as Unix-s
On 10/01/2008, Xuan Pan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I have two tables, one of them references the other. ...How do I define
> those two tables, DHCP settings table and DHCP client IP range table
> in a MIB file...
If the two tables have the same indexing style (e.g. both indexed by
a single in
Is it possible to do a SET BULK, i.e., setting multiple table rows in one
set operation?
When I tried I do the following command :
snmpset -v 2c -c public localhost IDX.1 i 1 Name.1 s "Name 1" IDX.2 i 2
Name.2 s "Name 2"
The Output was:
MY-MIB::IDX.1 = INTEGER: 1
MY-MIB::IDX.2 = INTE
what do you mean by recompiling ssl libraries in a correct manner?
On Jan 15, 2008 1:05 AM, Tsurutani Naoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tried on my FreeBSD/amd64 6-SATBLE, but I can not reproduce this error,
> with not configure args.
> I guess it is certainly not a relocatable binary with l
Hello Everybody
I have installed a Net-SNMP on a scientifc linux
And I receive on my snmp trap receiver some trap for which I can't find the
definition
Unknown alert received from device xx of type Host_Device. Device
Time 0+22:02:42.
(Trap type 1.3.6.1.4.1.99.12.52.3.1.6.3)
T
So it sounds like the first approach is acceptable for read-only data.
Are most SNMP savvy customers going to want the added security of
limiting the IP addresses that can access the data, even if it's
read-only? That's what it boils down to, what the customers are going to
want.
Maybe I don't und
On 15/01/2008, ERICJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In DISMAN Event MIB's Trigger Table it defines
>
> mteTriggerTargetTag
> The description says "The length of 0 indicates the local
> systemOtherwise access rights are checked according to the security
> parameters resulting from the tag"
> Is th
Excuse me,
I have some questions about DISMAN EVENT MIB with TARGET MIB.
I am wondering whether if I miss understanding the usage of these MIBs.
In DISMAN Event MIB's Trigger Table it defines
mteTriggerTargetTag
The description says "The length of 0 indicates the local
systemOtherwise access
Tsurutani Naoki wrote:
> BTW, why don't you use ports framework ?
Is there a FreeBSD ports package for 5.4.1? Looking at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/files/ it doesn't
look especially well-maintained. I'd say 5.4.1 may well be the better choice
for most people,
14 matches
Mail list logo
