RE: upgrading from 5.2.3 to 5.2.4

2008-02-07 Thread Bell, Adam
I have the upgrade working now. It basically came down to the -mini-agent flag. This apparently removes several required MIB groups (invisibly). So with that flag removed, I kept eliminating MIBs I do not need until I replicated the errors that started this thread. The resultant configure

libnetsnmp SEGV on free_enums

2008-02-07 Thread Frank Fegert
Hello all, i'm using a multi-threaded application (spine, http://cacti.net/spine_info.php) on Solaris 10 which uses libnetsnmp. Pretty often the application hangs, which i traced back to a SEGV occuring in free_enums(). See below for the gdb backtrace. I already updated net-snmp from 5.3.1 to

Re: strange behaviour

2008-02-07 Thread Dave Shield
On 06/02/2008, Devvrat Tripathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does that explain why my handler was never called? Because i never actually registered it for that context but something else ? Yes. Dave - This SF.net email is

Re: --enable-static=PKGS

2008-02-07 Thread Dave Shield
On 06/02/2008, Bell, Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One of the flags for configure is --enable-static=PKGS Does anyone have information about what PKGS are? I think (though I'm not sure) that this particular description text comes from the general autoconf framework, and is referring to

--enable-static=PKGS

2008-02-07 Thread Bell, Adam
All, One of the flags for configure is --enable-static=PKGS Does anyone have information about what PKGS are? Is PKGS literal or are there package names I should list: pkg1,pkg2,pkg3? Where are package names defined? What do they represent? Thanks, Adam The information contained in this

table retrieval in session or in transaction

2008-02-07 Thread Humpolicek
Hi, I want to implement snmp sub-agent to my application, which manages some group of processes (tells them to reconfigure, startning or shutting down them). In Snmp I imagine one read-only process table which will contains current information about managed processes (proc code, process

(net-snmp 5.3.1) partial response when querying ipAdEntAddr vs. native Solaris 9 agent

2008-02-07 Thread Matt Matson
Hello, I'm getting a partial result set when querying net-snmp agent (ver 5.3.1) for ipAdEntAddr vs. the same query against the native Solaris 9 agent. Thank you in advance for your help! Query native Solaris 9 agent ipAdEntAddr

Re: (net-snmp 5.3.1) partial response when querying ipAdEntAddr vs. native Solaris 9 agent

2008-02-07 Thread Thomas Anders
Matt Matson wrote: Hello, I'm getting a partial result set when querying net-snmp agent (ver 5.3.1) for ipAdEntAddr vs. the same query against the native Solaris 9 agent. I'd suggest upgrading to net-snmp 5.4.1 using configure --enable-mfd-rewrites which enables fully rewritten IP-MIB

stack memory requirement for net-snmp

2008-02-07 Thread Shawn_He
Does anyone what's the stack memory requirement for net-snmp agent to run in a thread? Thanks. -- Shawn He Online Technology Office:858-824-5969 Fax: 858-824-5878 AIM: CivRealtor - This SF.net email is sponsored by: