lanas wrote:
[M1 ./snmpd -H 21 | grep smux
/usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 14: Warning: Unknown token: smux.
smux isn't a supported config token for SMUX, only smuxpeer and
smuxsocket are. These don't appear in your output which suggests that you
*don't* have SMUX support compiled in.
I want to know, is there any snmp design for embedded system from net-snmp??
for example, i have heard net-snmp for pebble linux, but now pebble linux is
not support again, because superseded by Pyramid Linux.
If any, what is it?
thanks.
Regards,
Komang.
Dave,
OK, I will be upgrading shortly to net-snmp 5.3.1. Would you expect with
that version that the following trapsess will use the authoritative engineID
of the currently running snmpd process when sending traps to
target-manager?
trapsess -v 3 -u snmproot -a MD5 -A rootAuthPass -l authPriv -x
Hi,
I've been trying to compile a statically linked snmpd binary with
net-snmp-5.4.1 and on Ubuntu Gutsy.
I used the configure options described in the FAQ and in another
mailing list post:
* http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/FAQ:Compiling_06
*
HI All,
Is there any Difference between the snmpwalk with OBJ-ID as
number(digites) like :: *snmpwalk -v2c -c public
192.168.1.2361.3.6.1.4.1.4491.2.3.1.1
*
and the snmpwalk with OBJ-ID as TextForm :: *snmpwalk -v2c -c public
192.168.1.236 OC-STB-HOST-MIB::ocStbHostMibModule* , If not why it
Hi,
I tried to run the mfd example ifTable at
http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/tutorial/tutorial-5/toolkit/mfd/. The
files compiled fine, I tried to start ifTable with the options indicated
in the tutorial
i.e. ./ifTable -f -L -DifTable -M localhost:1161
When I do this, I get the
Le Vendredi, 04 Avril 2008 11:02:41 +0200,
Thomas Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
lanas wrote:
[M1 ./snmpd -H 21 | grep smux
/usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 14: Warning: Unknown token:
smux.
smux isn't a supported config token for SMUX, only smuxpeer and
smuxsocket are. These
Hello all,
I'm trying to run quagga's OSPF with net-snmp. It has authetication
problems and I'm not sure on whose behalf since this is the first time
I'm doing this.
First of all, is it possible to have SNMP - OSPF communications that
are in cleartext, without any encryption/authentication ?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Johns Victor
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:52 PM
No log handling enabled - turning on stderr logging
The -L flag should be -Le, I think.
registered debug token ifTable, 1
netsnmp_assert !registration !=
