2009/3/12 Tanisha Kashyap :
> 1) Do SMIv1 and v2 refer to any specific version of the SNMP protocols.
No.
As Pranesh says, SMIv1 is obsolete. Forget about it.
Write your MIB using SMIv2.
It can still be used with SNMPv1, SNMPv2c or SNMPv3
> 2) What is MIB-I and MIB-II? Are these also SNMP ve
Thanks.
Also I have some doubt about the IMPORTS clause i.e. what should be imported?
"No task is so humble that it does not offer an outlet for individuality"
-Original Message-
From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
Sent: Thursda
Thanks Dave.
The reason for my confusion regarding the SMI being specific to SNMP Version
was the text in the FROM clause.
As per my understanding from your earlier reply SNMPv2-SMI implies SMIv2
independent of the SNMP Version.
"No task is so humble that it does not offer an outlet for indivi
Hi all,
I am doing a project on SNMPv3. I was going through certain RFCs
(3411,3412,3417), wanted to query if the < net-snmp-5.4.2> package is
compliant with these RFCs? Could someone please tell me if that is the case,
or if not, could you please let me know which features or points are
missing?
Hi all,
I am doing a project on SNMPv3. I was going through certain RFCs
(3411,3412,3417), wanted to query if the < net-snmp-5.4.2> package is
compliant with these RFCs? Could someone please tell me if that is the case,
or if not, could you please let me know which features or points are
missing?
2009/3/12 Upakul Barkakaty :
> I wanted to query if the < net-snmp-5.4.2> package is
> compliant with these RFCs?
The Net-SNMP package supports SNMPv3, so
yes - it should be compliant with these RFCs.
Dave
--
Apps built
2009/3/12 Tanisha Kashyap :
> Also I have some doubt about the IMPORTS clause i.e. what should be imported?
Short answer: everything you refer to in the MIB file.
Longer answer:
There are two general sets of definition that you would typically IMPORT.
The first are "standard" definitions used
2009/3/12 Upakul Barkakaty :
> I have another query. Has there been any major changes between
> and with respect to these RFCs?
In terms of SNMPv3 support - no.
> Or is it the case that there has been mostly bug fixes between
>
> and now?
Bug fixes, and improvements to the information MIBs.
Dave,
Thanks a lot for your reply. Appreciate it.
I have another query. Has there been any major changes between
and with respect to these RFCs? Or is it
the case that there has been mostly bug fixes between and
now?
I am working on currently. Would you suugest that I move to
the current ver
Thanks Dave I ran net-snmp-config --configure-options and here is the output.
It looks like it was built with the smux option; third line from bottom,
(debian install).
Does that look correct??
e...@n3b0:~$ net-snmp-config --configure-options
'--prefix=/usr' '--sysconfdir=/etc' '--mandir=/u
Hello all,
I am trying to configure the net-snmp to use another agent for certain
requests. I've added a line like this to my snmpd.conf file and have
restarted the daemon:
proxy -v 3 -lauthNoPriv -aMD5 -Apassword -uuser agenthost .1.3.6.etc
I can successfully query the second agent directly
2009/3/12 Young, Alistair :
> I've tried specifying the second agent's engine ID in
> snmpd.conf but this didn't appear to help.
That would be my first approach, certainly.
How exactly did you try to do this?
Dave
-
2009/3/12 Kuczynski, Edward :
> Thanks Dave I ran net-snmp-config --configure-options and here is the output.
> It looks like it was built with the smux option; third line from bottom,
> (debian install).
>
> Does that look correct??
Looks OK - yes.
What do you see if you start the agent usin
2009/3/12 Young, Alistair :
> Attaching a packet sniffer it looks like, when the first request is
> sent, there's a whole series of exchanges between net-snmp and my other
> agent (over a period of around 4 seconds), which culminates in my other
> agent returning the requested value.
That sounds q
-Original Message-
From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
> > However, by this time, the snmpget request
> > has returned "NULL". The next request is fine (and seems to only
> > involve a single get/respon
Hi Dave,
I added a '-e' flag to the proxy line in snmpd.conf:
proxy -e 80001370010A2A -v 3 ...as before...
However, I've just realised that regardless of whether or not the engine
ID is specified, it's only my /first/ request that fails. Subsequent
requests are fine. Obviously in my previo
> From: Young, Alistair [mailto:alistair.yo...@logica.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 9:50 AM
> This is not such a big deal (there's a pretty simple
> workaround), but it
> does seem curious.
For SNMP monitoring in general, a lost packet or two is nothing to
worry about. It's to
Apologies for posting what is quite possibly a FAQ, but the mailing list
archives don't seem to have a search available.
1. Is it possible to write applications using Visual Studio 2008 with
NetSNMP?
2. If yes, is it possible to integrat NetSNMP into a /clr (not pure
obviously) application?
Thank
Hi Alfonso,
I've done this. For my need I wrote an app the remotely reboots
printers by writing a value to a private MIB based on the examples for
getting and setting a MIB value.
Create the project, in the properties menu for the project point the
"additional include folder" to the \net-snmp\
Thanks Dave.
I've compiled it, but i'm getting no answers from the agent to the
requisitions to my module. Other stuff like sysUpTime, for example, works!
My question is: do I have to put some include or initialization code
somewhere to my module to work?? Like I've done in mib_modules_init.h and
> I've done this. For my need I wrote an app the remotely
> reboots printers by writing a value to a private MIB based
> on the examples for getting and setting a MIB value.
>
> Create the project, in the properties menu for the project
> point the "additional include folder" to the \net-snmp
I installed the binary distribution.
Thanks,
Nick Bartolotti
Sr. Software Engineer
Pharos Systems International
From: Alfonso Urdaneta [mailto:aurdan...@indra-systems.com]
Sent: Thu 3/12/2009 8:18 PM
To: Nick Bartolotti; net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sub
22 matches
Mail list logo
