snmp.conf defaults Vs. Security

Hi guys, I'm defining the community name for SNMPv1 and SNMPv2c. I'm also defining the security name and authorization passwords in snmpd.conf. Now, I have scripts that call snmp commands. Now, since the community name and other parameters can change by configuration, I don't want to use -c in

using SNMPv3

Hi there, I'm creating a user for SNMPv3. In snmpd.conf: createUser user1 MD5 user_pass DES user_priv_pass rouser user1 Then I'm doing snmp get, snmpget -v 3 -u user1 -l noAuthNoPriv -A user_pass -a MD5 -x DES localhost sysUpTime.0 I get the follwoing error? Error in packet Reason: autho

Re: SNMPv3

Samer Vazdekis wrote: > I'm running net-snmp 5.2.1.2. Does this version support SNMPv3? Yes, it does. What authentication and privacy algorithms are supported depends on how the package was built. You may want to run: foo# snmpd -H 2>&1 | egrep 'def(Auth|Priv)Type' defAuthType M

SNMPv3

Hi there, I'm running net-snmp 5.2.1.2. Does this version support SNMPv3? Thanks. _ Stay in the loop and chat with friends, right from your inbox! http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9671354---

Re: retrieving the community name

2009/8/27 Samer Vazdekis : > Is there a net-snmp command to retrieve the community name? No. it is quite possible to configure the agent to support several community names (perhaps with different views and/or levels of access). It is also quite possible to configure the agent for SNMPv3 only, i

retrieving the community name

Hi there, Is there a net-snmp command to retrieve the community name? Thanks. _ Stay on top of things, check email from other accounts! http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9671355--

snmp table

Hi, I've implemented a table (data set). When I try to insert (first) row at index 0 everything is ok and I can see the row. If I try to insert at index 1, row is not created. In fact, the agent finishes with segmentation fault. Is it suitable for data_set to create first row at nonzero index

Re: regarding handling of " EINTR" in "receive()" function in "snmpd.c"

2009/8/28 sanjaykumar : > I have a doubt regarding handling of " EINTR" in "receive()" > function in "snmpd.c" > > Why does it required to handle the this Interrupt ? Quite honestly, I doubt anybody knows. I've checked the history of the snmpd.c file, and this statement is present back in the ori

regarding handling of " EINTR" in "receive()" function in "snmpd.c"

Hi All, I have a doubt regarding handling of " EINTR" in "receive()" function in "snmpd.c"  Why does it required to handle the this Interrupt ? what will  be impact if I will not remove i.e. stop Handling it ? Does any Basic functionalities get effected ? The way I handling ?