Hello all,
how do I validate a given mib module implementation ?
I have a mib with objects and notifications. I've implemented it.
Now... I need to be sure I have no miss-alignments between MIB and
agent...
errors... bad practices... warnings...
thank you
Joao
--
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:03:41 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail
> said:
JF> how do I validate a given mib module implementation ?
The best thing to do is test it. You can look in the "testing"
directory for some examples of tests we've used in order to test the
tools at a large scale. How y
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:24:11 +0300 (IDT), "Asaf Ohaion"
> said:
AO> I need to inject my custom handler to inetCidrRouteTable, but its
AO> mib_handler is not global, how can I do it ?
You can actually do it with the 'injectHandler' configuration token.
See the snmpd.conf manual page fo
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:38:25 -0400, "Ron Rader"
> said:
RR> C:\Temp>ping6 fe80::209:edff:fe00:16c9%5
RR> Pinging fe80::209:edff:fe00:16c9
RR> from fe80::214:22ff:fe33:8177%5 with 32 bytes of data:
RR> Reply from fe80::209:edff:fe00:16c9%5: bytes=32 time=1ms
RR> Reply from fe80::209:e
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:35:19 +0530, gunsnroses said:
g> (1) I need to modfy linkUpDownNotifications backend. I am working on switch
g> port interfaces, and to get to know the true state of an interface I need to
g> run a binary for each interface. So, I have to get to know the exact part of
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:42:09 +0530, Thazhai Arasan
> said:
TA> I have created my own mib with READ-WRITE access. After that i create the
TA> template code & compiled it. Then i put it into my board. But only snmpget
TA> is working, snmpset is not working. I cant set the values through
Hi Wes, thanks for the response.
> From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:harda...@users.sourceforge.net]
> Can you try something like 'udp6:[fe80::209:edff:fe00:16c9]:161' and
see
> if that works?
I put the following line in my snmpd.conf:
agentaddress udp6:[fe80::209:edff:fe00:16c9]:161
and received
Me:
> agentaddress udp:161 udp6:161
>
> I think the snmpd.conf man page may be off, since it seems to
include
> a comment delimiter in the agentaddress description.
"commA" delimiter!
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential
and protected from disclosu
Me:
> UPDATE: oh man, I just tried the following line and the agent
seemed
> to take it (snmpd appears to be running, no errors at restart), but I
> have not yet tried any SNMP traffic on IPv6:
>
> agentaddress udp:161 udp6:161
OK, when the agent is running on that agentaddress line, it gen
> g> (3) Also, I have to monitor if any of the usage in these partitions crosses
> g> 96%. Can I do another monitor with dskPath in sanmpd.conf withe the above
> g> where it is tracking for 90%? How?
>
> No, unfortunately it's a single warning level.
It's a single warning level per "disk" directiv
Switching gears for a minute, is there any way to use IPv6 addresses
for trap recipients? I've tried the following but both forms result in
snmpd errors:
trapsess -v 3 -u user -l authNoPriv -a MD5 -A userpw
fe80::214:22ff:fe33:8177
trapsess -v 3 -u user -l authNoPriv -a MD5 -A userpw
udp6:[fe8
Hi -
I thought the exceptions do not apply to my plugins, but then I remembered
the case where the cache load/unload code can be running when a handler is
called, and vice-versa. I have posted the problems this caused for me
earlier. Is this something you plan to fix in the main agent (the is a
Perhaps I'm going about this all wrong. It is possible that our
kernel supports IPv6, but that we don't include dependencies that
net-snmp relies upon to configure IPv6.
So, when a net-snmp module encounters "udp6" in configuration, what
does it do with the token? Process internally, hand of
I'm running Debian etch on an x86_64 box, I get the following problem with
net-snmp 5.2.3-7etch4,
mremap(0x2b26c4b0, 1353191424, 1353199616, MREMAP_MAYMOVE) =
0x2b26c4b0
mremap(0x2b26c4b0, 1353199616, 1353207808, MREMAP_MAYMOVE) =
0x2b26c4b0
mremap(0x2b26c4b0, 1353207808, 13532
14 matches
Mail list logo
