RE: running SNMPGET to poll from a port other than 161

2011-05-16 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
That worked Thx a lot *From:* Fulko Hew [mailto:fulko@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, May 13, 2011 12:08 PM *To:* Ujjval Karihaloo *Cc:* net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: running SNMPGET to poll from a port other than 161 On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Ujjval Karihaloo

net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net

2011-05-16 Thread Dave Shield
On 17 May 2011 04:21, William wrote: >> OK - so you are using the old v4 UCD coding, >>  rather than the newer v5 handler-based approach > > I develop my program according to the example.c( the old v4 UCD coding). > Are there some examples using the newer v5 handler-based approach? > > If yes,can

net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net

2011-05-16 Thread William
Dear: > OK - so you are using the old v4 UCD coding, > rather than the newer v5 handler-based approach I develop my program according to the example.c( the old v4 UCD coding). Are there some examples using the newer v5 handler-based approach? If yes,can you give me the link or examples? Look

Re: FreeBSD, zfs and dskTable

2011-05-16 Thread Dave Shield
On 16 May 2011 05:44, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > I'm using net-snmp 5.5 from ports on FreeBSD 8.x with zfs. > On each of my FreeBSD zfs resources are missing from dskTable. This support was added in release 5.5.1, and is present in the upcoming 5.7 release. Note that it is *not* present in 5.6.

net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net

2011-05-16 Thread Dave Shield
2011/5/15 王文桢 : > u_char *var_sgcc (struct variable *vp, >oid * name, >size_t * length, >int exact, size_t * var_len, WriteMethod ** > write_method) OK - so you are using the old v4 UCD