Value too large to be stored in data type

2017-06-28 Thread Tyson Sleck
Hello. I have net-snmp 5.6.1 running in place of the native snmp on HP-UX B.11.31.0809. I'm getting the following error in my snmpd.log when multiple TB volumes are scanned with snmpwalk: Value too large to be stored in data type This is preventing these large volumes from being reported and m

Re: Need Help on Snmpv3 AES issue

2017-06-28 Thread Bill Fenner
If you are using "net-snmp-create-v3-user", then no. That would be a good feature request to file at https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/feature-requests/new/ Bill On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Suhasini Katuri wrote: > Hi Bill, > > I've tried by adding rwuser sukaturi priv manually to > /

Re: Sending signed values problem

2017-06-28 Thread Bill Fenner
If you send a value between 0 and -128 you get a one byte value. If you send a value between -129 and -32768 you get a two byte value. This is BER encoding. You showed -130 being encoded properly, which is between -128 and -256 which is what you say doesn't work. I don't understand why you say

Re: Need Help on Snmpv3 AES issue

2017-06-28 Thread Suhasini Katuri
Hi Bill, I've tried by adding rwuser sukaturi priv manually to /usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf, it is giving me expected results. Is there anyway (command) to get priv along with rwuser in /usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf without editing it mannually. Thanks, Suhasini. On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at

Re: Sending signed values problem

2017-06-28 Thread corvace.fabrizio--- via Net-snmp-users
The problem is that the OID is a 16bit Integer, if i send -256 i get a 2byte signed value, but if i send any value between 0 and -128 i get a 1byte signed value, thus losing the range from -128 to -256, same thing for the positive range. I'm sorry, in the last mail i gave the wrong example repo