Hi!
We have written our own AgentX C++ subagent library and are testing it
against net-snmp snmpd.
We found the following:
If we try to send an agentx Notify-PDU containing the varbinds
snmpTrapOid.0 = anyOid
.2.1 = [OctetString: "test" ]
and have the include bit cleared in all Oids then the re
Mukherjee, Arijit (Arijit) wrote:
All,
Managed to get myself stuck again:(
I have got quite a few mib modules that use shared memory. Updating these
for int is not a big deal. However, for char * I am in trouble - I can keep
the pointers in the shared memory - but not the memory that they p
Dave Shield wrote:
I must admit that I'm reluctant to start adding such a prefix.
There are plenty of other headers that can be used to filter on,
and I'd tend to agree with those who regard this as unnecessary clutter.
(Particularly since the obvious choices are relatively long!)
Dave
I sugg
Mark H. Wood wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't suppose that the list exploder can make this a per-subscription
option, in deference to the many, MANY subscribers who will find the
prefix annoying and wholly unnecessary.
What happens when you filter on any of the many List
Anthony MASSE wrote:
Hi,
I want to integrate an agentX in a program but we can launch several instances of this program at the same time on the same host. Today, two instance of the program implements the same MIB then the snmpd (master agentx) send the demand (GET/SET) on only one program.
You sho
vijendra agarwal wrote:
I just want to confirm is my understanding is correct
or not?
and If I want to provide a support for multiple
subagent can implement a single MIB tree.
Is there any way by which I can implement it using
agentx protocol or some other protocol?
(First read Dave's answe
