Hi, >For the moment, I tested net-snmp 5.0.9 and 5.2.1; > Both of those versions are really, really, really stale and no longer in > development. > Have you considered 5.4.1?
Yes, I just test 5.4.1 with uClinux kernel 2.6.x. It works, but response time of snmp server is not performant (80 ms). >But ... response time with net-snmp ... are ... 80 ms...2.6.x...on > 2.4.x ...less 1 ms. > What, exactly, are you asking net-snmp to do? Is there a specific MIB > you're looking at? I use net-snmp like server snmp on my embedded app. And my application needs good performance of snmp server (and I must add a specific MIB). Too, snmp server must send traps. For the test: my SNMP manager sends (each second) a GET request only on "sysObjectId" variable of mibII, and with Ethereal, I measure response time of snmp server. I would like my snmp server (here, net-snmp) to be faster with kernel 2.6.x. Thanks you for your advices Best regards Cedric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
