Re: Fedora 10+x86_64+snmpd gives segfault in libc-2.9.so at startup

2008-12-06 Thread Jan Houtsma
Jan Safranek schreef: > Jan Houtsma wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Other reports are already getting in. It's only related to x86_64 >> systems. Apparently new releases >> are only tested on i386? Because this segfault is so obvious on x86_64 >> and happens as

Re: Fedora 10+x86_64+snmpd gives segfault in libc-2.9.so at startup (FIXED!)

2008-12-02 Thread Jan Houtsma
Mike Ayers schreef: >> From: Jan Houtsma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 12:19 PM >> > > >> Ok, However it is a fedora 10 rpm package. So i guess Fedora should >> rebuild, test and release it again? >> > >

Re: Fedora 10+x86_64+snmpd gives segfault in libc-2.9.so at startup

2008-12-01 Thread Jan Houtsma
Mike Ayers schreef: >> From: Jan Houtsma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 3:16 AM >> > > >> Other reports are already getting in. It's only related to x86_64 >> systems. Apparently new releasesare only tested on i386? &g

Re: snmpd suddenly stopped working

2008-12-01 Thread Jan Houtsma
Julius schreef: > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:50 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote: > >> Julius wrote: >> >>>>> Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]->[127.0.0.1]:-5226 REFUSED >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>> On Sun, 2008-11-3

Re: snmpd suddenly stopped working

2008-11-30 Thread Jan Houtsma
Isn't that the same as the one i posted before ("Re: Fedora 10+x86_64+snmpd gives segfault in libc-2.9.so at startup")? The first symptom of snmpd not starting is that you get connection errors.. Are you on x86_64? Greetz, jan Julius schreef: > Hi, > > i was using snmp v3 with AuthNoPriv, t

Re: Fedora 10+x86_64+snmpd gives segfault in libc-2.9.so at startup

2008-11-30 Thread Jan Houtsma
?func=detail&aid=2357163&group_id=12694&atid=112694 and the feedback notes on: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/net-snmp-5.4.2.1-1.fc10 -- Thanks, Jan Jan Houtsma schreef: > Hello, > > Noone else with Fedora 10 suffers this problem? Or is it just me? > > Tha

Re: Fedora 10+snmpd gives segfault in libc-2.9.so

2008-11-29 Thread Jan Houtsma
Hello, Noone else with Fedora 10 suffers this problem? Or is it just me? Thanks, Jan Jan Houtsma schreef: > Hi, > > I just upgraded my server from Fedora 9 to Fedora 10. This updated glibc > from 2.8 to 2.9. Starting de snmpd gives me the following segfault. I > hope someb

Fedora 10+snmpd gives segfault in libc-2.9.so

2008-11-25 Thread Jan Houtsma
Hi, I just upgraded my server from Fedora 9 to Fedora 10. This updated glibc from 2.8 to 2.9. Starting de snmpd gives me the following segfault. I hope somebody can help me because now also mrtg etc. doesn't work anymore. [0:23:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/sbin/snmpd -Lsd -Lf /dev/null -p /var/