Hi,
Is there a recommendation or standard on defining MIB objects which
represent aggregate data in proprietary MIBs ?
For example, if I have MIB object representing "process A" and the stats it
collects, I define it inside a table so that I can have multiple instances
of that process.
The SNMP m
Never mind. Got it working now.Thanks.On 2/13/06, Ramji Chandramouli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,Is there anything special I need to do config-wise ?By default, my
5.3.0.1 snmptrapd starts up as followsWarning: no access control information configured.
This receiver will *NOT* acce
Hi,Is there anything special I need to do config-wise ?By default, my 5.3.0.1 snmptrapd starts up as followsWarning: no access control information configured.
This receiver will *NOT* accept any incoming notifications.NET-SNMP version
5.3.0.1Then, when it receives a trap, it does not parse the tra
I would believe that the 'MAX-ACCESS' clause in the definition of your
MIB variables would control responses to SNMP requests.
"read-only" would allow responses to Get/GetNext requests.
"read-write" would allow responses to Get/Set requests.
On 12/22/05, Patil, Suresh (Suresh) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
using
net-snmp) any variable bindings in the trap even though the VARIABLES
clause in the MIB does not include those MIB objects.
Thanks.On 12/12/05, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 11:01 -0800, Ramji Chandramouli wrote:> In the VARIABLES clause, instead of sp
Hi,
My question is to with the VARIABLES clause in a TRAP-TYPE MACRO.
I would like to be able to do the following in my MIB.
myTrapTypeObject TRAP-TYPE
ENTERPRISE myEnterprise
VARIABLES { privateTable }
DESCRIPTION
"my trap type object"
::= 7
In the VARIABLES clause,
