Re: AgentX semantics

2008-10-08 Thread Chris Nelson
>> I'm sure this is in a spec somewhere and surely knowable from the code >> but if someone can answer off the top of their head, it'd save me a >> lot of digging and I'd appreciate it. > > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2257.txt?number=2257 > >You may need to reference it at some point. Thank

Re: AgentX semantics

2008-10-08 Thread Dave Shield
>> From: Chris Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> My monitors are surely talking only to snmpd so I wonder if snmpd >> opens a new session to the subagent for each incoming session/request >> or if it keeps a session open to the subagent and uses it over and >> over. There's a persistent Net-SNM

RE: AgentX semantics

2008-10-07 Thread Mike Ayers
> From: Chris Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 7:48 AM > I'm sure this is in a spec somewhere and surely knowable from the code > but if someone can answer off the top of their head, it'd save me a > lot of digging and I'd appreciate it. http://www.ietf.org/rfc

AgentX semantics

2008-10-07 Thread Chris Nelson
I'm sure this is in a spec somewhere and surely knowable from the code but if someone can answer off the top of their head, it'd save me a lot of digging and I'd appreciate it. I have a multi-threaded application which acts as an AgentX subagent for a couple of MIBs and I have monitoring programs