> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:17:35 -0700, "Jared Smith (jarsmith)"
> said:
JS> So I guess there really isn't a problem here just an inconsistency
JS> in terms of when the free method is called; however it appears not
JS> to be a real problem in terms of the end result.
That's what I suspect
rge.net
Subject: Re: Cached Tables and Injected Handler interaction with the
timer
>>>>> On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:21:25 -0700, "Jared Smith (jarsmith)"
said:
You described well an interesting problem.
JS> If it makes a difference this is running on version 5.2.2 not sure
if
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:21:25 -0700, "Jared Smith (jarsmith)"
> said:
You described well an interesting problem.
JS> If it makes a difference this is running on version 5.2.2 not sure if
JS> this issue may have been improved in a newer version?
Is there any way you can test with someth
In the MIB I am working on I currently have 2 tables both of which I
have a cache for so multiple hits would have less impact on the system
overall. As suggested in an earlier posting I generated the code with
mib2c and that was very helpful in terms of coming up with a template of
what the code s
