2009/12/1 Sam V :
> Is there another patch for existence triggers?
> startup condition would be present, absence, or both.
Hmmm... that's going to be harder.
The parsing of the "monitor" directive currently treats
the existence tests as an enumeration, rather than
as three independent bits.
And
Thanks Dave for your reply. I'll try to see if this would work. Now, is there
another patch for existence triggers? startup condition would be present,
absence, or both.
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:51:41 +
> Subject: Re: DISMAN Event MIB configuration: monitor
>
2009/11/30 Sam V :
> Now, in case of a threshold
> trigger
> which have multiple startup cases, Raising, Falling, RisingAndFalling. How
> can specify that I want a startup condition to be true on for the rising case
> and not all cases?
In term of conf
Hi,
Disman is evaluating the condition (see for details snmpd.conf man page)
every interval defined there and sends a trap first time the condition is
met (as opposed to first time it is evaluated). Next trap will be sent only
if condition becomes FALSE and then TRUE again. That is the base for
pro
Hi Guys,
I have a question about the syntax used to configure the disman event MIB in
snmpd.conf. Specifically, startup condition in monitor keyword. I noticed there
is an option -s to evaluate trigger on startup, and there is option -S not to
evaluate the trigger on startup. Now, in case of
