Burkhardt, Chris
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Error with net-snmp on Solaris 9 sparc
Burkhardt, Chris wrote.
> It failed again.
Oops, my fault. Please try "snmpd -I -at ..." instead.
+Thomas
Burkhardt, Chris wrote.
> It failed again.
Oops, my fault. Please try "snmpd -I -at ..." instead.
+Thomas
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to att
s
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Error with net-snmp on Solaris 9 sparc
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> Here are the results of running some more tests:
Thanks. Are you able to provide the requested back trace anytime soon?
Otherwise I don't see the slighte
e-cable.de]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 5:30 PM
To: Burkhardt, Chris
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Error with net-snmp on Solaris 9 sparc
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> That seems to have fixed the primary problem. There were a lot of
> errors (missing \'s) in the
o what I can.
-Chris
-----Original Message-
From: Thomas Anders [mailto:thomas.and...@blue-cable.de]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 5:44 PM
To: Burkhardt, Chris
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Error with net-snmp on Solaris 9 sparc
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> I a
ptember 23, 2009 3:30 PM
To: Burkhardt, Chris
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Error with net-snmp on Solaris 9 sparc
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> #0 0xff3b05c8 in memcpy ()
>from /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440/lib/libc_psr.so.1
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xff3b05c8 in mem
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> #0 0xff3b05c8 in memcpy ()
>from /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440/lib/libc_psr.so.1
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xff3b05c8 in memcpy ()
>from /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440/lib/libc_psr.so.1
> #1 0xff1f1508 in getMibstat (grid=MIB_INTERFACES, resp=0xffbfeb48,
> entry
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:55:29 +0200, Thomas Anders
> said:
TA> Thanks. Are you able to provide the requested back trace anytime
TA> soon? Otherwise I don't see the slightest chance to get a potential
TA> fix into the upcoming 5.5 release.
I agree this is looking more and more likely to
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> Here are the results of running some more tests:
Thanks. Are you able to provide the requested back trace anytime soon?
Otherwise I don't see the slightest chance to get a potential fix into the
upcoming 5.5 release.
+Thomas
--
: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Shield
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 3:24 AM
To: Burkhardt, Chris
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Error with net-snmp on Solaris 9 sparc
2009/9/22 Burkhardt, Chris :
> /us/local/bin/snmpwalk
2009/9/22 Burkhardt, Chris :
> /us/local/bin/snmpwalk -v 2c -c public -m .1.3 localhost
No - that's the wrong command.
What Mike was asking for was
snmpwalk -v 2c -c public localhost .1.3
(i.e. walking the whole tree, not just the standard objects).
> Also caused snmpd to die with a falk
2009/9/22 Burkhardt, Chris :
> I'm not specifying an OID. The command
>
> snmpwalk -v 2c -c public -m ALL localhost
>
> is what I type in. snmpd halts on both my dev and production boxes with that
> build.
[snip]
> As you can see from the truss, I am getting some response back from the
>
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Error with net-snmp on Solaris 9 sparc
> From: Burkhardt, Chris [mailto:cburkha...@medline.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 6:45 AM
> I'm not specifying an OID. The command
Try it against .1.3,
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> I am able to reproduce snmpd dying on the snmpwalk on both the
> production (E15k) and the development box (V440).
Thanks for your detailed feedback so far.
> making all in /var/tmp/net-snmp-5.5.rc3/agent
> make: Fatal error in reader: Makefile, line 333: Unexpected end
> From: Burkhardt, Chris [mailto:cburkha...@medline.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 6:45 AM
> I'm not specifying an OID. The command
Try it against .1.3, please.
Mike
--
Come build with us! The Black
Message-
From: Thomas Anders [mailto:thomas.and...@blue-cable.de]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 5:30 PM
To: Burkhardt, Chris
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Error with net-snmp on Solaris 9 sparc
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> That seems to have fixed the primary problem
) = 0
13964: getmsg(6, 0xFFBF4A38, 0x, 0xFFBF4A34) = 2
13964: getmsg(6, 0x, 0xFFBF4A38, 0xFFBF4A34) = 0
13964: getmsg(6, 0xFFBF4A38, 0x0000, 0xFFBF4A34) = 2
13964: getmsg(6, 0x, 0xFFBF4A38, 0xFFBF4A34) = 0
13964: getmsg(6, 0xFFBF4A38, 0x, 0xFFBF4A34) = 2
1
ubject: Re: Error with net-snmp on Solaris 9 sparc
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> I believe I am running into an issue with too many VLAN's or
> interfaces. When I bring up net-snmp (version 5.4.2.1 that I
downloaded
> precompiled from sunfreeware.com) it takes over a cpu (gets a lot of
> From: Thomas Anders [mailto:thomas.and...@blue-cable.de]
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:30 PM
> > compile. Also, there seems to be some other bug or issue related to
> the
> > snmpd process dying if you run the command snmpwalk -v 2c -c public -
> m
> > ALL localhost.
What OID d
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> That seems to have fixed the primary problem. There were a lot of
> errors (missing \'s) in the makefiles that I had to fix to get it to
> compile. Also, there seems to be some other bug or issue related to the
> snmpd process dying if you run the command snmpwalk -v 2c
Burkhardt, Chris wrote:
> I believe I am running into an issue with too many VLAN’s or
> interfaces. When I bring up net-snmp (version 5.4.2.1 that I downloaded
> precompiled from sunfreeware.com) it takes over a cpu (gets a lot of CPU
> time) and doesn’t respond to snmpwalk. Prior to adding extr
21 matches
Mail list logo
