The patch has removed the problem, Ive run a test for about 12 hours and the memory usage is now stable.
Thanks Mark On 6 May 2010 16:33, Mark Brooks <m...@loadbalancer.org> wrote: > We may have fixed it, by applying the patch > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2871747&group_id=12694&atid=312694 > > ill let you know how it goes > > Mark > > > On 6 May 2010 16:30, Mike Ayers <mike_ay...@tva.tvworks.com> wrote: > >> >> A nice detailed leak report. Coders, can you please investigate? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Brooks [mailto:m...@loadbalancer.org] >> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:33 AM >> To: Mike Ayers >> Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: Memory Leaking with NetSNMP V5.5 >> >> Sorry I ment 225 bytes not 255 >> >> >> On 6 May 2010 13:59, Mark Brooks <m...@loadbalancer.org> wrote: >> >> >> Ok we have had a further revelation after much testing we were able >> to work out that there is one particular OID that is leaking 255 bytes of >> data each time you run snmpwalk the oid in particular is: >> >> >> .1.3.6.1.2.1.88.1.4.3.1.3.6.95.115.110.109.112.100.95.109.116.101.84.114.105.103.103.101.114.82.105.115.105.110.103 >> or its shorter name is >> >> DISMAN-EVENT-MIB::mteEventNotificationObjects."_snmpd".'_mteTriggerRising' >> the result of which is - >> >> DISMAN-EVENT-MIB::mteEventNotificationObjects."_snmpd".'_mteTriggerRising' >> = STRING: _triggerFire >> >> we can quite happily run snmpwalk above and below this OID and get >> consistent memory usage with no sign of a leak. >> >> What we cant quite work out is what function is failing to free the >> memory after its run. >> >> any help on how to debug this further would be much appreciated. >> >> Mark >> >> >> On 5 May 2010 16:17, Mark Brooks <m...@loadbalancer.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 April 2010 00:59, Mike Ayers < >> mike_ay...@tva.tvworks.com> wrote: >> >> >> > From: Mark Brooks [mailto: >> m...@loadbalancer.org] >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:27 PM >> >> >> > We are running the 2.6.32.7 kernel with >> Centos 5.3 and using the LVS >> > SNMP module >> http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/Net-SNMP-LVS-Module >> > the memory usage increases each time we >> use snmpwalk to poll the system, >> > and increases with each query until the >> box crashes. Has anyone else >> > come across this issue. Or could kindly >> push us in the right direction >> > as where to look next. >> >> >> Run snmpd without the dlmod for the >> LVS module and try the same test. If there is no memory leak, then the >> problem is with with the LVS module, and you'll have to get support from >> them. If not, let us know. >> >> >> HTH, >> >> Mike >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
