Re: Fwd: Re: Subagent kills Master AgentX after sending 299 traps

2005-06-08 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 25 May 2005 07:04:55 -0700 (PDT) Salsa wrote: S assumed my subagent was killing it. Now I realize that S no one really dies. Actually it looks like my subagent S provoked a deadlock with master agentx. So it is there S waiting to send the final traps while master agent x S is there waiting

Re: Fwd: Re: Subagent kills Master AgentX after sending 299 traps

2005-06-03 Thread Dave Shield
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 20:17, Salsa wrote: Maybe it would be more useful to dump the raw packets instead. Try netsnmp_ds_set_boolean(NETSNMP_DS_LIBRARY_ID, NETSNMP_DS_LIB_DUMP_PACKET, 1); Ok, here goes a selected portion from both sides: MASTER

Re: Fwd: Re: Subagent kills Master AgentX after sending 299 traps

2005-06-03 Thread Salsa
--- Dave Shield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 20:17, Salsa wrote: Maybe it would be more useful to dump the raw packets instead. Try netsnmp_ds_set_boolean(NETSNMP_DS_LIBRARY_ID, NETSNMP_DS_LIB_DUMP_PACKET, 1); Ok, here goes

Re: Fwd: Re: Subagent kills Master AgentX after sending 299 traps

2005-06-01 Thread Salsa
Can you try the simplifications I suggested (taking the snmptrapd subagent behaviour and main subagent PING action out of the equation), and try running the master agent with the '-Dagent' debugging again. Ok, did that. Hope everything's right. I'm sending two files which

Re: Fwd: Re: Subagent kills Master AgentX after sending 299 traps

2005-05-25 Thread Dave Shield
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 15:18, Salsa wrote: Setting ping timeout and running on other machines didn't help either. I didn't really expect it would solve the problem. The idea is to clear away all the extraneous crud so we can clarify what exactly is wrong. I'm giving symptons like: All I know