On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:05:18 -0700 Rachel wrote:
RW> No, I haven't try to reproduce it with a later version. I am still new
RW> in using net-snmp, and I think it'll take me some time to migrate our
RW> current extended MIB.
You shouldn't have to migrate anything. We strive for backwards
compatibil
r versions?
Thanks a lot
Rachel
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story (Users) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 9:48 AM
To: Rachel Wang
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GET_BULK problem
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:06:14 -0700 Rachel wrote:
RW> I am using net-snmp-5.0
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:06:14 -0700 Rachel wrote:
RW> I am using net-snmp-5.0.9 and having problem with GET_BULK in my extended
RW> MIB. [...] Then, I use the last entry of the first GET_BULK response for
RW> the request of the 2nd GET_BULK, and ask for another 20 repetition (note I
RW> have only 14
I am using net-snmp-5.0.9 and having problem with GET_BULK in my extended MIB. I have
a table of 34 rows with the 9 columns (3 of which are indexes), and I perform GET_BULK
of 20 repetition on it specified the OID with index of each column . I am able to get
the first 20 back with the GET_BULK r
