Dave Shield wrote:
> 2008/6/27 Roy M. Silvernail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> ASN.1 coding uses one byte to indicate field length, limiting any one
>> component to 255 bytes.
>
> Where did you get this information?
> Because wherever you found it, it's wrong.
My apologies. Note to self: coffee before
2008/6/27 Roy M. Silvernail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ASN.1 coding uses one byte to indicate field length, limiting any one
> component to 255 bytes.
Where did you get this information?
Because wherever you found it, it's wrong.
ASN.1 and SMI do *not* use a single-byte for value lengths,
and can sup
ling zhou wrote:
> Hi, Group,
>
>
>
> I am using NET-SNMP version 5.2.1 on my embedded Linux system. My subagent
> is attached to snmpd via AgentX. The subagent was working well and we could
> get the SNMP table objects and scalar objects correctly until I implemented
> a string type scalar MIB
Hi, Group,
I am using NET-SNMP version 5.2.1 on my embedded Linux system. My subagent
is attached to snmpd via AgentX. The subagent was working well and we could
get the SNMP table objects and scalar objects correctly until I implemented
a string type scalar MIB variable (len of string > 256 byt
