On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> I noticed it too last week, but was waiting to submit my patch along with
> fixes to the much more broken pass_persisttest :-) (It doesn't appear to be
> using instance IDs at all in its OIDs.)
Oh, I take it back, I did post a patch.
https
I noticed it too last week, but was waiting to submit my patch along with fixes
to the much more broken pass_persisttest :-) (It doesn't appear to be using
instance IDs at all in its OIDs.)
Bill
On Nov 29, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 11 November 2011 02:42, Vasanth Ragavendra
On 11 November 2011 02:42, Vasanth Ragavendran
wrote:
>Apparently the passtest script had
> a tiny bug. The case statement which checks for a particular OID has been
> broken into multiple line but without any line continuation terminator '\'
> and which was
Thank you so much Alistair for replying. Apparently the passtest script had
a tiny bug. The case statement which checks for a particular OID has been
broken into multiple line but without any line continuation terminator '\'
and which was giving syntax error which i came to know only after i ran th
> I checked even with the
> wireshark, the get request and response packets are present, however the
> returned value is "No Such Instance". I even ran the snmpd with
> -Ducd-snmp/pass and it prints the following line
> ucd-snmp/pass: pass-running: /bin/sh
> /home/rvragav/11n/net-snmp-5.7.1/local/
Hi,
I'm using the "pass through" extension provided by the snmpd. And I'm using
the passtest script present inside the local directory with no changes made
to it and still I'm not able to get the values printed in the command line
and here is how my setup is. I've a virtual machine running slax(li
