Re: Question about snmptrapd to bind the same port for IPv4 and IPv6

2008-12-29 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Maybe the port is already in use. Have you checked with netstat before running snmptrapd? Does the error appear without specifying udp6? Try: $ sudo netstat -tan|grep -i 16 Also make sure you're running it as root. Some bind() code fails with amb

Re: Question about snmptrapd to bind the same port for IPv4 and IPv6

2008-12-29 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce début de soirée du lundi 22 décembre 2008, vers 21:34, Hui Zhang disait : > Hi, > I have problem to run the snmptrapd from Net-Snmp 5.4.2.1 when I tried to bind > the same port for IPv4 and IPv6. I built it using --disable-agent and > --enable-ipv6. > snmptrapd udp:165,udp6:165

Re: Question about snmptrapd to bind the same port for IPv4 and IPv6

2008-12-29 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Subject: Question about snmptrapd to bind the same port for IPv4 and IPv6 Hi, I have problem to run the snmptrapd from Net-Snmp 5.4.2.1 when I tried to bind the same port for IPv4 and IPv6. I built it using --disable-agent and --enable-ipv6. snmptrapd udp:165,udp6:165

Question about snmptrapd to bind the same port for IPv4 and IPv6

2008-12-29 Thread Hui Zhang
Hi, I have problem to run the snmptrapd from Net-Snmp 5.4.2.1 when I tried to bind the same port for IPv4 and IPv6. I built it using --disable-agent and --enable-ipv6. snmptrapd udp:165,udp6:165 It shows "Address already in use". Any one has clue? Thanks, Hui -