Hi Charles,
The next time you see it in this state, can you run "sudo ss -pane" and
share the output? I wonder if there are multiple listeners on port 53 and
that is confusing the data collection.
Bill
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 8:50 PM Charles Polisher wrote:
> > net-snmp ver 5.9.1
> >
> >
net-snmp ver 5.9.1
$ snmpwalk -v2c localhost .1
TCP-MIB::tcpInErrs.0 = Counter32: 0
TCP-MIB::tcpOutRsts.0 = Counter32: 0
TCP-MIB::tcpConnectionState.ipv4."192.168.122.102".52680.ipv4."192.168.1.200".514
= INTEGER: established(5)
TCP-MIB::tcpConnectionProcess.ipv4."192.168.122.
: Jim Su [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 4:06 PM
To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Error: OID not increasing
I have collected more data.
The agent seems to fall into the situation to handle a bogus "lowest" oid list
so it "walk" all the wa
known [55.6E.6B.6E.6F.77.6E (hex)]
9: sysORLastChange.0 (timeticks) 0 days 00h:00m:00s.00th (0)
...
Endless loop
-Original Message-
From: Jim Su [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:55 AM
To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Error: OID not inc
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Story
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 3:24 AM
To: Jim Su
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Error: OID not increasing
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:04:06 +0800 Jim wrote:
JS> My net-snmp version is 5.1
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:04:06 +0800 Jim wrote:
JS> My net-snmp version is 5.1.2.
JS> Yes, it is very consistent. If I run snmpd with the following command line
JS> options it doesn't give me the error message.
JS>
JS> /usr/sbin/snmpd -Lsd -L -f -Dgenie -p /var/run/snmpd.pid
JS>
JS> But if I star
rn;
case: ...
}
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Robert Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:32 PM
To: Jim Su
Cc: Jim Su; Net-Snmp-Users
Subject: Re: Error: OID not increasing
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:50:43 +0800 Jim wrote:
JS> I n
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:50:43 +0800 Jim wrote:
JS> I noticed the difference as following -
JS> If the snmpd is started with the following options : -f -L -Dge it's okay.
JS> No error occurred.
JS> If snmpd is started with the following options:-Lsd -Lf
JS> /dev/null -p
Hi Greeting:
More observation collected for this case.
I noticed the difference as following -
If the snmpd is started with the following options : -f -L -Dge it's okay. No
error occurred.
If snmpd is started with the following options:-Lsd -Lf /dev/null
-p /var/ru
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:24:43 +0100 MAUGER wrote:
MFER> MFER> SNMPv2-MIB::sysServices.0 = INTEGER: 2
MFER> MFER> SNMPv2-MIB::sysServices.0 = INTEGER: 34
MFER> MFER> Error: OID not increasing: SNMPv2-MIB::sysServices.0
MFER> MFER>
MFER> MFER> my snmpwalk is
First, your alias for the list address has a trailing '.', which causes my
mailserver to reject my replies to you. Please remove it.
i ve removed the '.' in the list adress it would be better now.
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:32:35 +0100 MAUGER wrote:
MFER> I've got an agent which is
First, your alias for the list address has a trailing '.', which causes my
mailserver to reject my replies to you. Please remove it.
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:32:35 +0100 MAUGER wrote:
MFER> I've got an agent which is configure in order to forward snmp request
MFER> thanks to the "proxy" command in sn
At a first glance, I would say that was an issue with the SNMP agent itself. I
have a similar issue with some Extreme switches where the MIB isn't constructed
correctly.
I see from the output that you have two sysServices returning from 'system' in
the mib-II mib. I was under the impression tha
13 matches
Mail list logo
