Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-25 Thread Dave Shield
2009/3/24 Mike Ayers mike_ay...@tvworks.com: From: Max Malzkuhn [mailto:mmalzk...@edgewaternetworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 4:20 PM snmp_parse: Parsed SNMPv3 message (secName:edgewater, secLevel:authNoPriv):  USM not in time window        Sync your clocks. How will that help? I

RE: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-25 Thread Max Malzkuhn
-Original Message- From: Mark Ellison [mailto:m...@ellisonsoftware.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 4:27 PM To: mmalzk...@edgewaternetworks.com Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd Hi Max, I don't think the createUser -e 0x0102030405

RE: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-25 Thread Max Malzkuhn
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd Hi Max, I don't think the createUser -e 0x0102030405is doing anything. I think the FC 4 box has an older version of snmptrapd that doesn't require the level of configuration you are looking at with the Fedora 10

Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-25 Thread Mark Ellison
, 2009 4:27 PM To: mmalzk...@edgewaternetworks.com Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd Hi Max, I don't think the createUser -e 0x0102030405is doing anything. I think the FC 4 box has an older version of snmptrapd that doesn't

Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-25 Thread Dave Shield
2009/3/25 Max Malzkuhn mmalzk...@edgewaternetworks.com:  I have a couple of different configs that I use to send v3 traps.  One has authNoPriv set and one has authPriv set. Can I use the same user for both? Yes.  If I get the user configured as authPriv,

Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-25 Thread Dave Shield
2009/3/25 Mark Ellison m...@ellisonsoftware.com: I believe the rule is that you want to have an administrative user with the same or better privileges { auth | priv } delete a user and you need an administrative user with the *same* privileges and protocols { auth | priv } to clone/create a

Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-24 Thread Mark Ellison
Hi Max, On 03/24/2009 02:54 PM, Max Malzkuhn wrote: Hello All, I am trying to receive traps on a FC10 box that is running net-snmp 5.4.2.1 When I run snmptrapd -f -Le -D and cause my remote system to send a trap, I get: snmp_parse: Parsed SNMPv3 message (secName:edgewater,

Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-24 Thread Mark Ellison
On 03/24/2009 05:55 PM, Max Malzkuhn wrote: Hi Mark. How do I figure out which is the right engineID? The 0102030405 is not the right one but it is what is in my receiver's config that works. Are you saying I should use the engineID 0x80001f8880a6aba16d9a0ec949 in my createUser? Did you

Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-24 Thread Mark Ellison
[mailto:m...@ellisonsoftware.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 3:08 PM To: mmalzk...@edgewaternetworks.com Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd On 03/24/2009 05:55 PM, Max Malzkuhn wrote: Hi Mark. How do I figure out which

RE: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-24 Thread Max Malzkuhn
...@edgewaternetworks.com Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd You are close...(snmpEngineID.0 should start with a lower case 's') snmpget -u edgewater -l authNoPriv -A edgewater 10.10.50.158 snmpEngineID.0 if it doesn't like this you can add

RE: Version 5.4.2.1 snmp v3 traps with snmptrapd

2009-03-24 Thread Mike Ayers
From: Max Malzkuhn [mailto:mmalzk...@edgewaternetworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 4:20 PM snmp_parse: Parsed SNMPv3 message (secName:edgewater, secLevel:authNoPriv): USM not in time window Sync your clocks. HTH, Mike