Hi Dave,
Thanks for the reply.
As per my understanding in the agent, Agent should first
receive the response and after that it should verify with the session list.
First we should recive the response and after we should check the
outstanding sessions list, i.e the for loop in t
On 4 November 2011 06:08, Venki wrote:
> Inform response/Get or set Request will be handled as explained below in
> SNMPv3 Mode.
Are you telling us about behaviour that you have actually seen,
or asking how the agent works?
> Problem is that if multiple informs(say minimum 2) are sent
Ok. Thanks for the responses. Some time ago, we deployed a distributed
Nagios installation, and the communication between the different
instances had to be done via SNMP notifications. We implemented a
small program, which consisted in a command line utility to insert a
trap in a SQLite database, a
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Antonio Grassi
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 1:01 AM
> reliable dispatch of the notifications.
Define this term. What you will need to do, and how complex it will
be, depends entirely on the definition of "reliable"
Ok. After the responses, I've read about DISMAN notification log MIBs.
There you can log the notifications, which you can query later via
SNMP. What is not clear to me, is the role of the network management
system (is that what you referred to by NMS, ¿no?), I mean, with
respect to the reliable dis
ifications
will not be delivered.
HTH,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ron Rader
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:31 AM
> To: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: Inform P
> From: Antonio Grassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Every certain time, the spooler takes unsent traps from the list,
> and trys to deliver them via an inform PDU to the destination
> - If the trap is acknowledged, the trap is removed from the list
Isn't that functionality already provided thr
On 17/09/2007, Steve Kittleson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does the agent handle the necessary retries and timeouts
Yes.
> Who/what does the processing when there is no response to an inform?
The snmp library handles this automatically.
> Specifically, how are the timeout and retrycoun
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Steve Kittleson
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:01 PM
> Can someone point me to documentation or explain how informs
> are handled by the agent? Does the agent handle the necessary
> retries and timeouts or does each in
Hello,
thank you Wes for your answers that
are always usefull !
I'm progressing but I still have some
questions...
So I have created rows for the tables
snmpNotifyTable, snmpTargetAddrTable and smpTargetParamsTable, using the
'createAndGo' (4) value.
First question: for the three tables,
I wante
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:24:31 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
cherrero> 1. I've defined my own traps in one private MIB but I don't
cherrero> understand how to use the SNMP-NOTIFICATION-MIB. Should I
cherrero> register my traps in this MIB ?
no, that mib actually registers destinations to w
Hello,
Wes, thank you very much for your answer
!
I've got 2 types of questions about
the use of these 2 MIBs (I've looked at all the net-snmp documentation
but couldn't find an answer)
1. I've defined my own traps in one
private MIB but I don't understand how to use the SNMP-NOTIFICATION-MIB.
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:20:02 -0600, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
cherrero> Does a MIB exist, including parameters to set addresses
cherrero> where to send informs ? Actually, I'm looking for a way to
cherrero> configure inform destination address remotly.
Yes, the combination of the NOTIFICAT
] On Behalf Of Wes
Hardaker
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:06 AM
To: Eugen
Cc: Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: inform
>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:24:09 -0500, "Eugen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
eugen> Is it send_v2trap blocking when sending
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:24:09 -0500, "Eugen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
eugen> Is it send_v2trap blocking when sending informs ?
No. It does not block.
eugen> In other words if I call twice send_v2trap can I be sure that
eugen> the 2nd call will be performed only when the ack of the 1st
eug
15 matches
Mail list logo
