RE: trapsess instead of trap2sink

2006-02-21 Thread Eugen
OK, it works now. It thought 162 is the default port for traps. Thanks a lot, Eugen -Original Message- From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:06 AM To: Eugen Cc: Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: trapsess instead of trap2sink

Re: trapsess instead of trap2sink

2006-02-21 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:20:32 -0500, Eugen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: eugen OK, it works now. It thought 162 is the default port for traps. It is... I think there is a problem with trapsess such that the way the default argument parsing is done it always defaults to 161. I thought that was fixed

Re: trapsess instead of trap2sink

2006-02-20 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:16:08 -0500, Eugen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: eugen If I'm trying to use trapsess instead as follows eugen trapsess -v 2c -c my_rwc localhost Can you try: trapsess -v 2c -c my_rwc localhost:162 -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc.