On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:48:26AM -0700, Qing wrote:
>5.4.1 is said to support AES, but the following command shows the snmpget
> does not even take
> AES as a valid parameter??
>I recompiled the source code on Solaris 9, with OpenSSL with AES support.
Is that the OpenSSL provided by Su
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Qing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>5.4.1 is said to support AES, but the following command shows the snmpget
> does not even take
> AES as a valid parameter??
>I recompiled the source code on Solaris 9, with OpenSSL with AES support.
>
> localhost_sys
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Qing
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 10:41 AM
> The same result for "AES256" as "AES" where I can find
> SVN REV 15666?
> I heard it from the following email:
>
> -
> With Rev. 15666 put into version
The same result for "AES256" as "AES" where I can find SVN REV 15666?
I heard it from the following email:
-
With Rev. 15666 put into version 5.4 source code AES now seems to be
working beautifully. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Anders [mailto:[EMAIL P
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Qing
>5.4.1 is said to support AES, but the following command
> shows the snmpget does not even take
> AES as a valid parameter??
>I recompiled the source code on Solaris 9, with OpenSSL
> with AES support.
>
> loc
