On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:20 AM, bheemesh v bheem...@gmail.com wrote:
Attaching call graph of the profiled snmpd daemon.
Find the graph in attachment.
(replying to an e-mail of two weeks ago)
The call graph is interesting. What you did not yet tell us, and what
is important in order to
HI Bart,
Thanks very much for your inputs.
In fact we have 500+ IP's configured on this machine.
Meanwhile as a optimization i tried was to avoid the
netsnmp_binary_array_get() call from netsnmp_binary_array_insert(), so
that sort will be called only when the last entry in the container is being
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM, bheemesh v bheem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Bart Van Assche bart.vanass...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:20 AM, bheemesh v bheem...@gmail.com wrote:
Attaching call graph of the profiled snmpd daemon.
Find the graph
HI,
Thanks Mike for notifying this part.
But i have a more generic question now on the logic of updating the MIB
entries (such as IF-MIB, IP-MIB etc) to NMS:
There are 2 triggers for updates done to the NMS:
1) Whenever a new network configuration is done, will there be a trigger to
update the
From: bheemesh v [mailto:bheem...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 2:20 AM
Attaching call graph of the profiled snmpd daemon.
Find the graph in attachment.
I think you are misreading this chart. It does show that 81% of
runtime is spent inside run_alarms, but 0% of that
From: bheemesh v [mailto:bheem...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 10:25 PM
I was profiling through the net-snmp 5.4.2.1 and found that run_alarms()
was contributing majorly to the CPU load from the
snmplib/snmp_alarm.c file.
Check your snmpd.conf file. I suspect you've
2009/12/8 Mike Ayers mike_ay...@tvworks.com:
Check your snmpd.conf file. I suspect you've got a lot of
monitoring turned on. Many of the monitors: disman, RMON,
hardware monitoring, etc. use alarms to schedule their activity, it would
seem.
There are also some MIB modules which rely
